TY - JOUR
T1 - Breast cancer screening
T2 - On our way to the future
AU - Delaloge, Suzette
AU - Bachelot, Thomas
AU - Bidard, François Clément
AU - Espie, Marc
AU - Brain, Etienne
AU - Bonnefoi, Hervé
AU - Gligorov, Joseph
AU - Dalenc, Florence
AU - Hardy-Bessard, Anne Claire
AU - Azria, David
AU - Jacquin, Jean Philippe
AU - Lemonnier, Jérôme
AU - Jacot, William
AU - Goncalves, Anthony
AU - Coutant, Charles
AU - Ganem, Gérard
AU - Petit, Thierry
AU - Penault-Lorca, Frédérique
AU - Debled, Marc
AU - Campone, Mario
AU - Levy, Christelle
AU - Coudert, Bruno
AU - Lortholary, Alain
AU - Venat-Bouvet, Laurence
AU - Grenier, Julien
AU - Bourgeois, Hugues
AU - Asselain, Bernard
AU - Arvis, Johanna
AU - Castro, Martine
AU - Tardivon, Anne
AU - Cox, David G.
AU - Arveux, Patrick
AU - Balleyguier, Corinne
AU - André, Fabrice
AU - Rouzier, Roman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Société Française du Cancer
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Breast cancer remains a potentially lethal disease, which requires aggressive treatments and is associated with long-term consequences. Its prognosis is linked to both tumor biology and burden at diagnosis. Although treatments have allowed important improvements in prognosis over the past 20 years, breast cancer screening remains necessary. Mammographic screening allows earlier stage diagnoses and a decrease of breast cancer specific mortality. However, breast cancer screening modalities should be revised with the objective to address demonstrated limitations of mammographic screening (limited benefit, imperfect sensitivity and specificity, overdiagnoses, radiation-induced morbidity). Furthermore, both objective and perceived performances of screening procedures should be improved. Numerous large international efforts are ongoing, leading to scientific progresses that should have rapid clinical implications in this area. Among them is improvement of imaging techniques performance, development of real time diagnosis, and development of new non radiological screening techniques such as the search for circulating tumor DNA, development of biomarkers able to allow precise risk evaluation and stratified screening. As well, overtreatment is currently addressed by biomarker-based de-escalation clinical trials. These advances need to be associated with strong societal support, as well as major paradigm changes regarding the way health and cancer prevention is perceived by individuals.
AB - Breast cancer remains a potentially lethal disease, which requires aggressive treatments and is associated with long-term consequences. Its prognosis is linked to both tumor biology and burden at diagnosis. Although treatments have allowed important improvements in prognosis over the past 20 years, breast cancer screening remains necessary. Mammographic screening allows earlier stage diagnoses and a decrease of breast cancer specific mortality. However, breast cancer screening modalities should be revised with the objective to address demonstrated limitations of mammographic screening (limited benefit, imperfect sensitivity and specificity, overdiagnoses, radiation-induced morbidity). Furthermore, both objective and perceived performances of screening procedures should be improved. Numerous large international efforts are ongoing, leading to scientific progresses that should have rapid clinical implications in this area. Among them is improvement of imaging techniques performance, development of real time diagnosis, and development of new non radiological screening techniques such as the search for circulating tumor DNA, development of biomarkers able to allow precise risk evaluation and stratified screening. As well, overtreatment is currently addressed by biomarker-based de-escalation clinical trials. These advances need to be associated with strong societal support, as well as major paradigm changes regarding the way health and cancer prevention is perceived by individuals.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Personalized
KW - Risk
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989885478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.06.005
DO - 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.06.005
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27473920
AN - SCOPUS:84989885478
SN - 0007-4551
VL - 103
SP - 753
EP - 763
JO - Bulletin du Cancer
JF - Bulletin du Cancer
IS - 9
ER -