TY - JOUR
T1 - Chromogranin A measurement in metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma
T2 - Screening for false positives and a prospective follow-up study
AU - Vezzosi, Delphine
AU - Walter, Thomas
AU - Laplanche, Agnès
AU - Raoul, Jean Luc
AU - Dromain, Clarisse
AU - Ruszniewski, Philippe
AU - d'Herbomez, Michèle
AU - Guigay, Joël
AU - Mitry, Emmanuel
AU - Cadiot, Guillaume
AU - Leboulleux, Sophie
AU - Lombard-Bohas, Catherine
AU - Borson-Chazot, Françoise
AU - Ducreux, Michel
AU - Baudin, Eric
PY - 2011/4/1
Y1 - 2011/4/1
N2 - Background: Multiple causes of false-positive chromogranin A (CgA) measurement have been reported that may affect its impact as a surrogate marker of RECIST progression in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumoars (WDGEPNET). Aims: 1) To evaluate the frequency of false-positive CgA results. 2) To prospectively compare CgA variations with RECIST morphological changes in patients without known causes of false-positive CgA measurements. Methods: First, the conditions responsible for potentially false-positive CgA measurements were screened in 184 consecutive patients with metastatic WDGEPNET. Secondly, a variation in CgA at a 6-month interval was compared to RECIST results at 6 months in 46 patients. Results: Among 184 patients, elevated CgA was found in 130 cases (71%) including 99 patients with at least one cause of a false-positive result. Impaired kidney function as well as medication with proton pump inhibitors were found to be the 2 major causes of false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of CgA measurements compared with morphological tumor changes according to the RECIST criteria were 71% and 50%, respectively, at 6 months. Conclusion: Routine screening for the causes of false-positive CgA measurements is mandatory in WDGEPNET patients. Our study does not validate the use of CgA as a surrogate marker of tumor progression.
AB - Background: Multiple causes of false-positive chromogranin A (CgA) measurement have been reported that may affect its impact as a surrogate marker of RECIST progression in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumoars (WDGEPNET). Aims: 1) To evaluate the frequency of false-positive CgA results. 2) To prospectively compare CgA variations with RECIST morphological changes in patients without known causes of false-positive CgA measurements. Methods: First, the conditions responsible for potentially false-positive CgA measurements were screened in 184 consecutive patients with metastatic WDGEPNET. Secondly, a variation in CgA at a 6-month interval was compared to RECIST results at 6 months in 46 patients. Results: Among 184 patients, elevated CgA was found in 130 cases (71%) including 99 patients with at least one cause of a false-positive result. Impaired kidney function as well as medication with proton pump inhibitors were found to be the 2 major causes of false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of CgA measurements compared with morphological tumor changes according to the RECIST criteria were 71% and 50%, respectively, at 6 months. Conclusion: Routine screening for the causes of false-positive CgA measurements is mandatory in WDGEPNET patients. Our study does not validate the use of CgA as a surrogate marker of tumor progression.
KW - Chromogranin a
KW - False positives
KW - Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine carcinoma
KW - Prospective study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959316686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5301/JBM.2011.8327
DO - 10.5301/JBM.2011.8327
M3 - Article
C2 - 21574156
AN - SCOPUS:79959316686
SN - 0393-6155
VL - 26
SP - 94
EP - 101
JO - International Journal of Biological Markers
JF - International Journal of Biological Markers
IS - 2
ER -