TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical effect of molecular methods in sarcoma diagnosis (GENSARC)
T2 - a prospective, multicentre, observational study
AU - Italiano, Antoine
AU - Di Mauro, Ilaria
AU - Rapp, Jocelyn
AU - Pierron, Gaëlle
AU - Auger, Nathalie
AU - Alberti, Laurent
AU - Chibon, Frédéric
AU - Escande, Fabienne
AU - Voegeli, Anne Claire
AU - Ghnassia, Jean Pierre
AU - Keslair, Frédérique
AU - Laé, Marick
AU - Ranchère-Vince, Dominique
AU - Terrier, Philippe
AU - Baffert, Sandrine
AU - Coindre, Jean Michel
AU - Pedeutour, Florence
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Background Advances in molecular genetics of sarcoma have enabled the identification of type-specific aberrations. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of systematic implementation of molecular assays to improve sarcoma misdiagnosis. Methods In this multicentre, observational study, we recruited patients from 32 centres of the French Sarcoma Group/Reference Network in Pathology of Sarcomas. Eligibility criteria included: biopsy or surgical resection; suspicion of: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (cohort 1), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (cohort 2), Ewing's sarcoma family of tumours (cohort 3), synovial sarcoma (cohort 4), alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (cohort 5), and myxoid or round cell liposarcoma (cohort 6); review by one sarcoma-expert pathologist; availability of frozen material (except for cohort 1 of patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans because anti-CD34 immunohistochemistry is performed on paraffin-embedded tissue); and patient information. For each case, the pathologist made one primary diagnosis followed by up to two differential diagnoses, based on histological characteristics only. Each diagnosis was classified as certain, probable, or possible. For each case to determine the molecular classification, we did fluorescence in-situ hybridisation on paraffin-embedded samples. We also did comparative genomic hybridisation and quantitative PCR (cohort 2) or reverse transcriptase PCR (cohorts 3–6) on frozen and paraffin-embedded samples. We made a final diagnosis based on the molecular results. The clinical effect of diagnosis correction was assessed by a board of experts. Finding Between June 22, 2009, and Oct 30, 2012, 395 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 384 were eligible for inclusion. The diagnosis was eventually modified by molecular genetics for 53 patients: eight (16%) of 50 patients with dermatofibrosarcoma (cohort 1), seven (23%) of 30 patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (cohort 2), 13 (12%) of 112 with Ewing's sarcoma family of tumours (cohort 3), 16 (16%) of 97 patients with synovial sarcoma (cohort 4), seven (15%) of 46 patients with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (cohort 5), and two (4%) of 49 patients with myxoid or round cell liposarcoma (cohort 6), with an effect on primary management or prognosis assessment in 45 cases. Interpretation Molecular genetic testing should be mandatory for diagnostic accuracy of sarcoma and appropriate clinical management, even when histological diagnosis is made by pathologist experts in this field. Funding French National Cancer Institute and Nice University Hospital.
AB - Background Advances in molecular genetics of sarcoma have enabled the identification of type-specific aberrations. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of systematic implementation of molecular assays to improve sarcoma misdiagnosis. Methods In this multicentre, observational study, we recruited patients from 32 centres of the French Sarcoma Group/Reference Network in Pathology of Sarcomas. Eligibility criteria included: biopsy or surgical resection; suspicion of: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (cohort 1), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (cohort 2), Ewing's sarcoma family of tumours (cohort 3), synovial sarcoma (cohort 4), alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (cohort 5), and myxoid or round cell liposarcoma (cohort 6); review by one sarcoma-expert pathologist; availability of frozen material (except for cohort 1 of patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans because anti-CD34 immunohistochemistry is performed on paraffin-embedded tissue); and patient information. For each case, the pathologist made one primary diagnosis followed by up to two differential diagnoses, based on histological characteristics only. Each diagnosis was classified as certain, probable, or possible. For each case to determine the molecular classification, we did fluorescence in-situ hybridisation on paraffin-embedded samples. We also did comparative genomic hybridisation and quantitative PCR (cohort 2) or reverse transcriptase PCR (cohorts 3–6) on frozen and paraffin-embedded samples. We made a final diagnosis based on the molecular results. The clinical effect of diagnosis correction was assessed by a board of experts. Finding Between June 22, 2009, and Oct 30, 2012, 395 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 384 were eligible for inclusion. The diagnosis was eventually modified by molecular genetics for 53 patients: eight (16%) of 50 patients with dermatofibrosarcoma (cohort 1), seven (23%) of 30 patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (cohort 2), 13 (12%) of 112 with Ewing's sarcoma family of tumours (cohort 3), 16 (16%) of 97 patients with synovial sarcoma (cohort 4), seven (15%) of 46 patients with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (cohort 5), and two (4%) of 49 patients with myxoid or round cell liposarcoma (cohort 6), with an effect on primary management or prognosis assessment in 45 cases. Interpretation Molecular genetic testing should be mandatory for diagnostic accuracy of sarcoma and appropriate clinical management, even when histological diagnosis is made by pathologist experts in this field. Funding French National Cancer Institute and Nice University Hospital.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959911583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00583-5
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00583-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 26970672
AN - SCOPUS:84959911583
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 17
SP - 532
EP - 538
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 4
ER -