Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA sequencing with a large panel: a National Center for Precision Medicine (PRISM) study

A. Bayle, L. Belcaid, M. Aldea, D. Vasseur, F. Peyraud, C. Nicotra, A. Geraud, M. Sakkal, L. Seknazi, L. Cerbone, F. Blanc-Durand, J. Hadoux, F. Mosele, M. Tagliamento, A. Bernard-Tessier, B. Verret, C. Smolenschi, R. Clodion, N. Auger, P. M. RomanoA. Gazzah, M. N. Camus, J. Micol, O. Caron, A. Hollebecque, Y. Loriot, B. Besse, L. Lacroix, E. Rouleau, S. Ponce, J. C. Soria, F. Barlesi, F. Andre, A. Italiano

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    32 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing is a promising approach for tailoring therapy in patients with cancer. We report hereby the results from a prospective study where we investigated the impact of comprehensive molecular profiling of ctDNA in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Genomic analysis was performed using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx Assay [324 genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability status]. Each individual genomic report was reviewed and discussed weekly by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB). Actionable targets were classified by ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) tier leading to molecular-based treatment suggestions wherever it was possible. Results: Between December 2020 and November 2021, 1772 patients with metastatic solid tumors underwent molecular profiling. Median time to assay results was 12 days. Results were contributive for 1658 patients (94%). At least one actionable target was detected in 1059 patients (64%) with a total of 1825 actionable alterations including alteration of the DNA damage repair response pathway (n = 336, 18%), high TMB (>16 mutations/Mb; n = 243, 13%), PIK3CA mutations (n = 150, 8%), ERBB family pathway alterations (n = 127, 7%), PTEN alterations (n = 95, 5%), FGFR alterations (n = 67, 4%) and MET activations (n = 13, 0.7%). The MTB recommended a matched therapy for 597 patients (56%) with a total of 819 therapeutic orientations: clinical trials (n = 639, 78%), off-label/compassionate use (n = 81, 10%), approved drug (n = 51, 6%), and early access program (n = 48, 6%). In total, 122 patients (21%) were treated. Among the assessable patients (n = 107), 4 (4%) had complete response, 35 (33%) had partial response, 27 (25%) had stable disease, and 41 (38%) a progressive disease as best response. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.7 months (95% confidence interval 2.7-6.7 months) and 8.3 months (95% confidence interval 4.7-11.9 months) respectively. Conclusions: ctDNA sequencing with a large panel is an efficient approach to match patients with advanced cancer with targeted therapies.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)389-396
    Nombre de pages8
    journalAnnals of Oncology
    Volume34
    Numéro de publication4
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 avr. 2023

    Contient cette citation