Combination chemotherapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma

Martin Fassnacht, Massimo Terzolo, Bruno Allolio, Eric Baudin, Harm Haak, Alfredo Berruti, Staffan Welin, Carmen Schade-Brittinger, André Lacroix, Barbara Jarzab, Halfdan Sorbye, David J. Torpy, Vinzenz Stepan, David E. Schteingart, Wiebke Arlt, Matthias Kroiss, Sophie Leboulleux, Paola Sperone, Anders Sundin, Ilse HermsenStefanie Hahner, Holger S. Willenberg, Antoine Tabarin, Marcus Quinkler, Christelle De La Fouchardière, Martin Schlumberger, Franco Mantero, Dirk Weismann, Felix Beuschlein, Hans Gelderblom, Hanneke Wilmink, Monica Sender, Maureen Edgerly, Werner Kenn, Tito Fojo, Hans Helge Müller, Britt Skogseid

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    647 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare cancer that has a poor response to cytotoxic treatment. METHODS: We randomly assigned 304 patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma to receive mitotane plus either a combination of etoposide (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area on days 2 to 4), doxorubicin (40 mg per square meter on day 1), and cisplatin (40 mg per square meter on days 3 and 4) (EDP) every 4 weeks or streptozocin (streptozotocin) (1 g on days 1 to 5 in cycle 1; 2 g on day 1 in subsequent cycles) every 3 weeks. Patients with disease progression received the alternative regimen as second-line therapy. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: For first-line therapy, patients in the EDP-mitotane group had a significantly higher response rate than those in the streptozocin-mitotane group (23.2% vs. 9.2%, P<0.001) and longer median progression-free survival (5.0 months vs. 2.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.69; P<0.001); there was no significant between-group difference in overall survival (14.8 months and 12.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.02; P = 0.07). Among the 185 patients who received the alternative regimen as second-line therapy, the median duration of progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the EDP-mitotane group and 2.2 months in the streptozocin-mitotane group. Patients who did not receive the alternative second-line therapy had better overall survival with first-line EDP plus mitotane (17.1 month) than with streptozocin plus mitotane (4.7 months). Rates of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of response and progression-free survival were significantly better with EDP plus mitotane than with streptozocin plus mitotane as first-line therapy, with similar rates of toxic events, although there was no significant difference in overall survival. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; FIRM-ACT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094497.)

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)2189-2197
    Nombre de pages9
    journalNew England Journal of Medicine
    Volume366
    Numéro de publication23
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 7 juin 2012

    Contient cette citation