TY - JOUR
T1 - Combining dosiomics and machine learning methods for predicting severe cardiac diseases in childhood cancer survivors
T2 - the French Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
AU - Bentriou, Mahmoud
AU - Letort, Véronique
AU - Chounta, Stefania
AU - Fresneau, Brice
AU - Do, Duyen
AU - Haddy, Nadia
AU - Diallo, Ibrahima
AU - Journy, Neige
AU - Zidane, Monia
AU - Charrier, Thibaud
AU - Aba, Naila
AU - Ducos, Claire
AU - Zossou, Vincent S.
AU - de Vathaire, Florent
AU - Allodji, Rodrigue S.
AU - Lemler, Sarah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Bentriou, Letort, Chounta, Fresneau, Do, Haddy, Diallo, Journy, Zidane, Charrier, Aba, Ducos, Zossou, de Vathaire, Allodji and Lemler.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Background: Cardiac disease (CD) is a primary long-term diagnosed pathology among childhood cancer survivors. Dosiomics (radiomics extracted from the dose distribution) have received attention in the past few years to assess better the induced risk of radiotherapy (RT) than standard dosimetric features such as dose-volume indicators. Hence, using the spatial information contained in the dosiomics features with machine learning methods may improve the prediction of CD. Methods: We considered the 7670 5-year survivors of the French Childhood Cancer Survivors Study (FCCSS). Dose-volume and dosiomics features are extracted from the radiation dose distribution of 3943 patients treated with RT. Survival analysis is performed considering several groups of features and several models [Cox Proportional Hazard with Lasso penalty, Cox with Bootstrap Lasso selection, Random Survival Forests (RSF)]. We establish the performance of dosiomics compared to baseline models by estimating C-index and Integrated Brier Score (IBS) metrics with 5-fold stratified cross-validation and compare their time-dependent error curves. Results: An RSF model adjusted on the first-order dosiomics predictors extracted from the whole heart performed best regarding the C-index (0.792 ± 0.049), and an RSF model adjusted on the first-order dosiomics predictors extracted from the heart’s subparts performed best regarding the IBS (0.069 ± 0.05). However, the difference is not statistically significant with the standard models (C-index of Cox PH adjusted on dose-volume indicators: 0.791 ± 0.044; IBS of Cox PH adjusted on the mean dose to the heart: 0.074 ± 0.056). Conclusion: In this study, dosiomics models have slightly better performance metrics but they do not outperform the standard models significantly. Quantiles of the dose distribution may contain enough information to estimate the risk of late radio-induced high-grade CD in childhood cancer survivors.
AB - Background: Cardiac disease (CD) is a primary long-term diagnosed pathology among childhood cancer survivors. Dosiomics (radiomics extracted from the dose distribution) have received attention in the past few years to assess better the induced risk of radiotherapy (RT) than standard dosimetric features such as dose-volume indicators. Hence, using the spatial information contained in the dosiomics features with machine learning methods may improve the prediction of CD. Methods: We considered the 7670 5-year survivors of the French Childhood Cancer Survivors Study (FCCSS). Dose-volume and dosiomics features are extracted from the radiation dose distribution of 3943 patients treated with RT. Survival analysis is performed considering several groups of features and several models [Cox Proportional Hazard with Lasso penalty, Cox with Bootstrap Lasso selection, Random Survival Forests (RSF)]. We establish the performance of dosiomics compared to baseline models by estimating C-index and Integrated Brier Score (IBS) metrics with 5-fold stratified cross-validation and compare their time-dependent error curves. Results: An RSF model adjusted on the first-order dosiomics predictors extracted from the whole heart performed best regarding the C-index (0.792 ± 0.049), and an RSF model adjusted on the first-order dosiomics predictors extracted from the heart’s subparts performed best regarding the IBS (0.069 ± 0.05). However, the difference is not statistically significant with the standard models (C-index of Cox PH adjusted on dose-volume indicators: 0.791 ± 0.044; IBS of Cox PH adjusted on the mean dose to the heart: 0.074 ± 0.056). Conclusion: In this study, dosiomics models have slightly better performance metrics but they do not outperform the standard models significantly. Quantiles of the dose distribution may contain enough information to estimate the risk of late radio-induced high-grade CD in childhood cancer survivors.
KW - FCCSS
KW - cardiac disease
KW - childhood cancer
KW - dosiomics
KW - machine learning
KW - survival analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85212216738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2024.1241221
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2024.1241221
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85212216738
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 14
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 1241221
ER -