TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of two mitotane starting dose regimens in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma
AU - Kerkhofs, T. M.
AU - Baudin, E.
AU - Terzolo, M.
AU - Allolio, B.
AU - Chadarevian, R.
AU - Mueller, H. H.
AU - Skogseid, B.
AU - Leboulleux, S.
AU - Mantero, F.
AU - Haak, H. R.
AU - Fassnacht, M.
PY - 2013/12/1
Y1 - 2013/12/1
N2 - Context: Mitotane is the only approved drug for treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. Its pharmacokinetic properties are not fully elucidated and different dosing regimens have never been compared head to head. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the relationship between mitotane dose and plasma concentration comparing two dosing regimens. Design/Setting: This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter trial of a predefined duration of 12 weeks. Patients/Interventions: Forty mitotane-naïve patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma were assigned to a predefined low- or high-dose regimen by the local investigator. Thirty-two patients could be evaluated in detail. Main Outcome Measure: The difference in median mitotane plasma levels between both treatment groups was measured. Results: Despite a difference in mean cumulative dose (440 ± 142 g vs 272 ± 121 g), median maximum plasma levels were not significantly different between the two groups [high dose 14.3 mg/L (range 6.3-29.7, n = 20) vs 11.3 mg/L (range 5.5-20.0, n = 12), P = .235]. Ten of 20 patients onthe high-dose regimen reached plasma concentrations of 14 mg/L or greater after 46 days (range 18-81 d) compared with 4 of 12 patients on the low-dose regimen after 55 days (range 46-74 d, P = .286). All patients who reached 14 mg/L at 12 weeks displayed a level of 4.1 mg/L or greater on day 33 (100% sensitivity). There were no significant differences in frequency and severity of adverse events. Among patients not receiving concomitant chemotherapy mitotane exposure was higher in the high-dose group: 1013 ± 494 mg/L · d vs 555 ± 168 mg/L · d (P = .080). Conclusions: The high-dose starting regimen resulted in neither significantly different mitotane levels nor a different rate of adverse events, but concomitant chemotherapy influenced these results. Thus, for mitotane monotherapy the high-dose approach is favorable, whereas for combination therapy a lower dose seems reasonable.
AB - Context: Mitotane is the only approved drug for treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. Its pharmacokinetic properties are not fully elucidated and different dosing regimens have never been compared head to head. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the relationship between mitotane dose and plasma concentration comparing two dosing regimens. Design/Setting: This was a prospective, open-label, multicenter trial of a predefined duration of 12 weeks. Patients/Interventions: Forty mitotane-naïve patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma were assigned to a predefined low- or high-dose regimen by the local investigator. Thirty-two patients could be evaluated in detail. Main Outcome Measure: The difference in median mitotane plasma levels between both treatment groups was measured. Results: Despite a difference in mean cumulative dose (440 ± 142 g vs 272 ± 121 g), median maximum plasma levels were not significantly different between the two groups [high dose 14.3 mg/L (range 6.3-29.7, n = 20) vs 11.3 mg/L (range 5.5-20.0, n = 12), P = .235]. Ten of 20 patients onthe high-dose regimen reached plasma concentrations of 14 mg/L or greater after 46 days (range 18-81 d) compared with 4 of 12 patients on the low-dose regimen after 55 days (range 46-74 d, P = .286). All patients who reached 14 mg/L at 12 weeks displayed a level of 4.1 mg/L or greater on day 33 (100% sensitivity). There were no significant differences in frequency and severity of adverse events. Among patients not receiving concomitant chemotherapy mitotane exposure was higher in the high-dose group: 1013 ± 494 mg/L · d vs 555 ± 168 mg/L · d (P = .080). Conclusions: The high-dose starting regimen resulted in neither significantly different mitotane levels nor a different rate of adverse events, but concomitant chemotherapy influenced these results. Thus, for mitotane monotherapy the high-dose approach is favorable, whereas for combination therapy a lower dose seems reasonable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889768438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1210/jc.2013-2281
DO - 10.1210/jc.2013-2281
M3 - Article
C2 - 24057287
AN - SCOPUS:84889768438
SN - 0021-972X
VL - 98
SP - 4759
EP - 4767
JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
IS - 12
ER -