TY - JOUR
T1 - Correlates of circulating ovarian cancer early detection markers and their contribution to discrimination of early detection models
T2 - results from the EPIC cohort
AU - Fortner, Renée T.
AU - Vitonis, Allison F.
AU - Schock, Helena
AU - Hüsing, Anika
AU - Johnson, Theron
AU - Fichorova, Raina N.
AU - Fashemi, Titilayo
AU - Yamamoto, Hidemi S.
AU - Tjønneland, Anne
AU - Hansen, Louise
AU - Overvad, Kim
AU - Boutron-Ruault, Marie Christine
AU - Kvaskoff, Marina
AU - Severi, Gianluca
AU - Boeing, Heiner
AU - Trichopoulou, Antonia
AU - Benetou, Vassiliki
AU - La Vecchia, Carlo
AU - Palli, Domenico
AU - Sieri, Sabina
AU - Tumino, Rosario
AU - Matullo, Giuseppe
AU - Mattiello, Amalia
AU - Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte
AU - Peeters, Petra H.
AU - Weiderpass, Elisabete
AU - Gram, Inger Torhild
AU - Jareid, Mie
AU - Quirós, J. Ramón
AU - Duell, Eric J.
AU - Sánchez, Maria Jose
AU - Chirlaque, María Dolores
AU - Ardanaz, Eva
AU - Larrañaga, Nerea
AU - Nodin, Björn
AU - Brändstedt, Jenny
AU - Idahl, Annika
AU - Khaw, Kay Tee
AU - Allen, Naomi
AU - Gunter, Marc
AU - Johansson, Mattias
AU - Dossus, Laure
AU - Merritt, Melissa A.
AU - Riboli, Elio
AU - Cramer, Daniel W.
AU - Kaaks, Rudolf
AU - Terry, Kathryn L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s).
PY - 2017/3/20
Y1 - 2017/3/20
N2 - Background: Ovarian cancer early detection markers CA125, CA15.3, HE4, and CA72.4 vary between healthy women, limiting their utility for screening. Methods: We evaluated cross-sectional relationships between lifestyle and reproductive factors and these markers among controls (n = 1910) from a nested case-control study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Improvements in discrimination of prediction models adjusting for correlates of the markers were evaluated among postmenopausal women in the nested case-control study (n = 590 cases). Generalized linear models were used to calculate geometric means of CA125, CA15.3, and HE4. CA72.4 above vs. below limit of detection was evaluated using logistic regression. Early detection prediction was modeled using conditional logistic regression. Results: CA125 concentrations were lower, and CA15.3 higher, in post- vs. premenopausal women (p ≤ 0.02). Among postmenopausal women, CA125 was higher among women with higher parity and older age at menopause (ptrend ≤ 0.02), but lower among women reporting oophorectomy, hysterectomy, ever use of estrogen-only hormone therapy, or current smoking (p < 0.01). CA15.3 concentrations were higher among heavier women and in former smokers (p ≤ 0.03). HE4 was higher with older age at blood collection and in current smokers, and inversely associated with OC use duration, parity, and older age at menopause (≤ 0.02). No associations were observed with CA72.4. Adjusting for correlates of the markers in prediction models did not improve the discrimination. Conclusions: This study provides insights into sources of variation in ovarian cancer early detection markers in healthy women and informs about the utility of individualizing marker cutpoints based on epidemiologic factors.
AB - Background: Ovarian cancer early detection markers CA125, CA15.3, HE4, and CA72.4 vary between healthy women, limiting their utility for screening. Methods: We evaluated cross-sectional relationships between lifestyle and reproductive factors and these markers among controls (n = 1910) from a nested case-control study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Improvements in discrimination of prediction models adjusting for correlates of the markers were evaluated among postmenopausal women in the nested case-control study (n = 590 cases). Generalized linear models were used to calculate geometric means of CA125, CA15.3, and HE4. CA72.4 above vs. below limit of detection was evaluated using logistic regression. Early detection prediction was modeled using conditional logistic regression. Results: CA125 concentrations were lower, and CA15.3 higher, in post- vs. premenopausal women (p ≤ 0.02). Among postmenopausal women, CA125 was higher among women with higher parity and older age at menopause (ptrend ≤ 0.02), but lower among women reporting oophorectomy, hysterectomy, ever use of estrogen-only hormone therapy, or current smoking (p < 0.01). CA15.3 concentrations were higher among heavier women and in former smokers (p ≤ 0.03). HE4 was higher with older age at blood collection and in current smokers, and inversely associated with OC use duration, parity, and older age at menopause (≤ 0.02). No associations were observed with CA72.4. Adjusting for correlates of the markers in prediction models did not improve the discrimination. Conclusions: This study provides insights into sources of variation in ovarian cancer early detection markers in healthy women and informs about the utility of individualizing marker cutpoints based on epidemiologic factors.
KW - CA125
KW - CA15.3
KW - Early detection markers
KW - HE4
KW - Ovarian cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015771545&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13048-017-0315-6
DO - 10.1186/s13048-017-0315-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 28320479
AN - SCOPUS:85015771545
SN - 1757-2215
VL - 10
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Journal of Ovarian Research
JF - Journal of Ovarian Research
IS - 1
M1 - 20
ER -