Cost of cancer diagnosis using next-generation sequencing targeted gene panels in routine practice: A nationwide French study

Patricia Marino, Rajae Touzani, Lionel Perrier, Etienne Rouleau, Dede Sika Kossi, Zou Zhaomin, Nathanaël Charrier, Nicolas Goardon, Claude Preudhomme, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle Borget, Sandrine Baffert, Emmanuel Barillot, Stéphane Bezieau, Lucie Coppin, Clothilde Descapentries, Sébastien Forget, Thierry Frebourd, Philippe Guardiola, Claude HoudayerPhilippe Hupe, Ludovic Lacroix, Julie Leclerc, Alexandra Lespagnol, Stéphanie Longuemare, Jean Mosser, Marie Françoise Odou, Françoise Revillion, Nicolas Sevenet, Isabelle Soubeyran, Dominique Vaur

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    59 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    It is currently unclear if next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can be implemented in the diagnosis setting at an affordable cost. The aim of this study was to measure the total cost of performing NGS in clinical practice in France, in both germline and somatic cancer genetics. The study was performed on 15 French representative cancer molecular genetics laboratories performing NGS panels' tests. The production cost was estimated using a micro-costing method with resources consumed collected in situ in each laboratory from a healthcare provider perspective. In addition, we used a top-down methodology for specific post-sequencing steps including bioinformatics, technical validation, and biological validation. Additional non-specific costs were also included. Costs were detailed per step of the process (from the pre-analytical phase to delivery of results), and per cost driver (consumables, staff, equipment, maintenance, overheads). Sensitivity analyses were performed. The mean total cost of NGS for targeted gene panels was estimated to 607€ (±207) in somatic genetics and 550€ (±140) in germline oncogenetic analysis. Consumables were the highest cost driver of the sequencing process. The sensitivity analysis showed that a 25% reduction of consumables resulted in a 15% decrease in total NGS cost in somatic genetics, and 13% in germline analysis. Additional costs accounted for 30-32% of the total NGS costs. Beyond cost assessment considerations, the diffusion of NGS technologies will raise questions about their efficiency when compared to more targeted approaches, and their added value in a context of routine diagnosis.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)314-323
    Nombre de pages10
    journalEuropean Journal of Human Genetics
    Volume26
    Numéro de publication3
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 mars 2018

    Contient cette citation