TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost of cancer diagnosis using next-generation sequencing targeted gene panels in routine practice
T2 - A nationwide French study
AU - Marino, Patricia
AU - Touzani, Rajae
AU - Perrier, Lionel
AU - Rouleau, Etienne
AU - Kossi, Dede Sika
AU - Zhaomin, Zou
AU - Charrier, Nathanaël
AU - Goardon, Nicolas
AU - Preudhomme, Claude
AU - Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
AU - Borget, Isabelle
AU - Baffert, Sandrine
AU - Barillot, Emmanuel
AU - Bezieau, Stéphane
AU - Coppin, Lucie
AU - Descapentries, Clothilde
AU - Forget, Sébastien
AU - Frebourd, Thierry
AU - Guardiola, Philippe
AU - Houdayer, Claude
AU - Hupe, Philippe
AU - Lacroix, Ludovic
AU - Leclerc, Julie
AU - Lespagnol, Alexandra
AU - Longuemare, Stéphanie
AU - Mosser, Jean
AU - Odou, Marie Françoise
AU - Revillion, Françoise
AU - Sevenet, Nicolas
AU - Soubeyran, Isabelle
AU - Vaur, Dominique
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 European Society of Human Genetics.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - It is currently unclear if next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can be implemented in the diagnosis setting at an affordable cost. The aim of this study was to measure the total cost of performing NGS in clinical practice in France, in both germline and somatic cancer genetics. The study was performed on 15 French representative cancer molecular genetics laboratories performing NGS panels' tests. The production cost was estimated using a micro-costing method with resources consumed collected in situ in each laboratory from a healthcare provider perspective. In addition, we used a top-down methodology for specific post-sequencing steps including bioinformatics, technical validation, and biological validation. Additional non-specific costs were also included. Costs were detailed per step of the process (from the pre-analytical phase to delivery of results), and per cost driver (consumables, staff, equipment, maintenance, overheads). Sensitivity analyses were performed. The mean total cost of NGS for targeted gene panels was estimated to 607€ (±207) in somatic genetics and 550€ (±140) in germline oncogenetic analysis. Consumables were the highest cost driver of the sequencing process. The sensitivity analysis showed that a 25% reduction of consumables resulted in a 15% decrease in total NGS cost in somatic genetics, and 13% in germline analysis. Additional costs accounted for 30-32% of the total NGS costs. Beyond cost assessment considerations, the diffusion of NGS technologies will raise questions about their efficiency when compared to more targeted approaches, and their added value in a context of routine diagnosis.
AB - It is currently unclear if next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can be implemented in the diagnosis setting at an affordable cost. The aim of this study was to measure the total cost of performing NGS in clinical practice in France, in both germline and somatic cancer genetics. The study was performed on 15 French representative cancer molecular genetics laboratories performing NGS panels' tests. The production cost was estimated using a micro-costing method with resources consumed collected in situ in each laboratory from a healthcare provider perspective. In addition, we used a top-down methodology for specific post-sequencing steps including bioinformatics, technical validation, and biological validation. Additional non-specific costs were also included. Costs were detailed per step of the process (from the pre-analytical phase to delivery of results), and per cost driver (consumables, staff, equipment, maintenance, overheads). Sensitivity analyses were performed. The mean total cost of NGS for targeted gene panels was estimated to 607€ (±207) in somatic genetics and 550€ (±140) in germline oncogenetic analysis. Consumables were the highest cost driver of the sequencing process. The sensitivity analysis showed that a 25% reduction of consumables resulted in a 15% decrease in total NGS cost in somatic genetics, and 13% in germline analysis. Additional costs accounted for 30-32% of the total NGS costs. Beyond cost assessment considerations, the diffusion of NGS technologies will raise questions about their efficiency when compared to more targeted approaches, and their added value in a context of routine diagnosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040941023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41431-017-0081-3
DO - 10.1038/s41431-017-0081-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 29367707
AN - SCOPUS:85040941023
SN - 1018-4813
VL - 26
SP - 314
EP - 323
JO - European Journal of Human Genetics
JF - European Journal of Human Genetics
IS - 3
ER -