TY - JOUR
T1 - Datopotamab Deruxtecan Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Treated Inoperable/Metastatic Hormone Receptor–Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer
T2 - Primary Results From TROPION-Breast01
AU - TROPION-Breast01 Investigators
AU - Bardia, Aditya
AU - Jhaveri, Komal
AU - Im, Seock Ah
AU - Pernas, Sonia
AU - De Laurentiis, Michelino
AU - Wang, Shusen
AU - Jañez, Noelia Martínez
AU - Borges, Giuliano
AU - Cescon, David W.
AU - Hattori, Masaya
AU - Lu, Yen Shen
AU - Hamilton, Erika
AU - Zhang, Qingyuan
AU - Tsurutani, Junji
AU - Kalinsky, Kevin
AU - Liedke, Pedro Emanuel Rubini
AU - Xu, Lu
AU - Fairhurst, Rick M.
AU - Khan, Sabrina
AU - Denduluri, Neelima
AU - Rugo, Hope S.
AU - Xu, Binghe
AU - Pistilli, Barbara
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2025/1/20
Y1 - 2025/1/20
N2 - PURPOSE The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized TROPION-Breast01 study assessed the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2–directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) versus investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR1/HER2–) breast cancer. METHODS Adult patients with inoperable/metastatic HR1/HER2‒ breast cancer, who had disease progression on endocrine therapy, for whom endocrine therapy was unsuitable, and had received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in the inoperable/metastatic setting, were randomly assigned 1:1 to Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or ICC (eribulin/vinorelbine/capecitabine/gemcitabine). Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Patients were randomly assigned to Dato-DXd (n 5 365) or ICC (n 5 367). Dato-DXd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death versus ICC (PFS by BICR hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76]; P < .0001). Consistent PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. Although OS data were not mature, a trend favoring Dato-DXd was observed (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.14]). The rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Dato-DXd was lower than ICC (20.8% v 44.7%). The most common TRAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were nausea (51.1%; 1.4%) and stomatitis (50%; 6.4%) with Dato-DXd and neutropenia (grouped term, 42.5%; 30.8%) with ICC. CONCLUSION Patients receiving Dato-DXd had statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and a favorable and manageable safety profile, compared with ICC. Results support Dato-DXd as a novel treatment option for patients with inoperable/metastatic HR1/HER2‒ breast cancer who have received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in this setting.
AB - PURPOSE The global, phase 3, open-label, randomized TROPION-Breast01 study assessed the trophoblast cell surface antigen 2–directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) versus investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (ICC) in hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HR1/HER2–) breast cancer. METHODS Adult patients with inoperable/metastatic HR1/HER2‒ breast cancer, who had disease progression on endocrine therapy, for whom endocrine therapy was unsuitable, and had received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in the inoperable/metastatic setting, were randomly assigned 1:1 to Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or ICC (eribulin/vinorelbine/capecitabine/gemcitabine). Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Patients were randomly assigned to Dato-DXd (n 5 365) or ICC (n 5 367). Dato-DXd significantly reduced the risk of progression or death versus ICC (PFS by BICR hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76]; P < .0001). Consistent PFS benefit was observed across subgroups. Although OS data were not mature, a trend favoring Dato-DXd was observed (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.14]). The rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Dato-DXd was lower than ICC (20.8% v 44.7%). The most common TRAEs (any grade; grade ≥3) were nausea (51.1%; 1.4%) and stomatitis (50%; 6.4%) with Dato-DXd and neutropenia (grouped term, 42.5%; 30.8%) with ICC. CONCLUSION Patients receiving Dato-DXd had statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and a favorable and manageable safety profile, compared with ICC. Results support Dato-DXd as a novel treatment option for patients with inoperable/metastatic HR1/HER2‒ breast cancer who have received one to two previous lines of chemotherapy in this setting.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205104452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.24.00920
DO - 10.1200/JCO.24.00920
M3 - Article
C2 - 39265124
AN - SCOPUS:85205104452
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 43
SP - 285
EP - 296
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -