TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential benefit of adjuvant everolimus according to endocrine therapy backbone in the randomized UNIRAD trial
AU - Saint-Ghislain, M.
AU - Chabaud, S.
AU - Dalenc, F.
AU - Allouache, D.
AU - Cameron, D.
AU - Martinez, M.
AU - Grenier, J.
AU - Barthelemy, P.
AU - Brunt, M.
AU - Kaluzinski, L.
AU - Mailliez, A.
AU - Legouffe, E.
AU - Hardy-Bessard, A. C.
AU - Giacchetti, S.
AU - Mouret-Reynier, M. A.
AU - Canon, J. L.
AU - Bliss, J.
AU - Lemonnier, J.
AU - Andre, F.
AU - Bachelot, T.
AU - Cottu, P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/5/1
Y1 - 2025/5/1
N2 - Background: The randomized, double-blind UNIRAD trial evaluating the addition of 2 years of everolimus to endocrine therapy in patients with high-risk, early luminal breast cancer failed to demonstrate a benefit. We report the subgroup analyses. Patients and methods: We randomly assigned 1278 patients in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive 2 years of placebo or everolimus, added to endocrine therapy for up to 4 years after initiation. Randomization was stratified by endocrine therapy agent, prior adjuvant versus neoadjuvant therapy, progesterone receptor expression, and lymph node involvement. Subgroup analyses by each stratification factor were pre-specified. Post hoc analyses were carried out according to menopausal status and age. Treatment adherence was also analyzed. Results: We observed a limited trend toward more favorable prognostic features in tamoxifen-treated patients, with more frequent estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive tumors (88.5% versus 84.1%, P = 0.026) and less frequent pN2-positive status (39.8% versus 46.0%, P = 0.032). In premenopausal women, we observed a numerical benefit of everolimus: 3-year disease-free survival was 86% in the placebo group and 90% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.34). In premenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen (n = 153; 12.3%), we observed an even stronger trend in favor of everolimus as 3-year DFS was 84% in the placebo group and 91% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.02). Early discontinuation of either everolimus or placebo was less frequent in the tamoxifen group than in the aromatase inhibitor group: 48.0% versus 56.9% (P = 0.028). Conclusions: The present post hoc analyses generate hypotheses regarding the interaction between menopausal status, tamoxifen, and everolimus in patients with high-risk, ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early breast cancer. They suggest that tamoxifen alone is an underpowered endocrine treatment in high-risk premenopausal patients.
AB - Background: The randomized, double-blind UNIRAD trial evaluating the addition of 2 years of everolimus to endocrine therapy in patients with high-risk, early luminal breast cancer failed to demonstrate a benefit. We report the subgroup analyses. Patients and methods: We randomly assigned 1278 patients in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive 2 years of placebo or everolimus, added to endocrine therapy for up to 4 years after initiation. Randomization was stratified by endocrine therapy agent, prior adjuvant versus neoadjuvant therapy, progesterone receptor expression, and lymph node involvement. Subgroup analyses by each stratification factor were pre-specified. Post hoc analyses were carried out according to menopausal status and age. Treatment adherence was also analyzed. Results: We observed a limited trend toward more favorable prognostic features in tamoxifen-treated patients, with more frequent estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive tumors (88.5% versus 84.1%, P = 0.026) and less frequent pN2-positive status (39.8% versus 46.0%, P = 0.032). In premenopausal women, we observed a numerical benefit of everolimus: 3-year disease-free survival was 86% in the placebo group and 90% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.43-1.34). In premenopausal patients treated with tamoxifen (n = 153; 12.3%), we observed an even stronger trend in favor of everolimus as 3-year DFS was 84% in the placebo group and 91% in the everolimus group (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.02). Early discontinuation of either everolimus or placebo was less frequent in the tamoxifen group than in the aromatase inhibitor group: 48.0% versus 56.9% (P = 0.028). Conclusions: The present post hoc analyses generate hypotheses regarding the interaction between menopausal status, tamoxifen, and everolimus in patients with high-risk, ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early breast cancer. They suggest that tamoxifen alone is an underpowered endocrine treatment in high-risk premenopausal patients.
KW - adjuvant therapy
KW - everolimus
KW - luminal breast cancer
KW - premenopausal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002491402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105050
DO - 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105050
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002491402
SN - 2059-7029
VL - 10
JO - ESMO Open
JF - ESMO Open
IS - 5
M1 - 105050
ER -