TY - JOUR
T1 - Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study
AU - Ferris, R. L.
AU - Haddad, R.
AU - Even, C.
AU - Tahara, M.
AU - Dvorkin, M.
AU - Ciuleanu, T. E.
AU - Clement, P. M.
AU - Mesia, R.
AU - Kutukova, S.
AU - Zholudeva, L.
AU - Daste, A.
AU - Caballero-Daroqui, J.
AU - Keam, B.
AU - Vynnychenko, I.
AU - Lafond, C.
AU - Shetty, J.
AU - Mann, H.
AU - Fan, J.
AU - Wildsmith, S.
AU - Morsli, N.
AU - Fayette, J.
AU - Licitra, L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Background: Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated clinical benefit in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Combining immunotherapies targeting PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has shown evidence of additive activity in several tumor types. This phase III study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody) versus standard of care (SoC) in R/M HNSCC patients. Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1: 1: 1 durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [q2w]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (durvalumab 20 mg/kg q4w plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w × 4, then durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), or SoC (cetuximab, a taxane, methotrexate, or a fluoropyrimidine). The primary end points were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab versus SoC, and OS for durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Results: Patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n = 240), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 247), or SoC (n = 249). No statistically significant improvements in OS were observed for durvalumab versus SoC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72–1.08; P = 0.20] or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85–1.26; P = 0.76). The 12-month survival rates (95% CI) were 37.0% (30.9–43.1), 30.4% (24.7–36.3), and 30.5% (24.7–36.4) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were consistent with previous reports. The most common trAEs (any grade) were hypothyroidism for durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (11.4% and 12.2%, respectively), and anemia (17.5%) for SoC. Grade ≥3 trAE rates were 10.1%, 16.3%, and 24.2% for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in OS for durvalumab or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. However, higher survival rates at 12 to 24 months and response rates demonstrate clinical activity for durvalumab. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02369874.
AB - Background: Targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has demonstrated clinical benefit in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Combining immunotherapies targeting PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has shown evidence of additive activity in several tumor types. This phase III study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody) versus standard of care (SoC) in R/M HNSCC patients. Patients and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1: 1: 1 durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks [q2w]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (durvalumab 20 mg/kg q4w plus tremelimumab 1 mg/kg q4w × 4, then durvalumab 10 mg/kg q2w), or SoC (cetuximab, a taxane, methotrexate, or a fluoropyrimidine). The primary end points were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab versus SoC, and OS for durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and duration of response. Results: Patients were randomly assigned to receive durvalumab (n = 240), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 247), or SoC (n = 249). No statistically significant improvements in OS were observed for durvalumab versus SoC [hazard ratio (HR): 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72–1.08; P = 0.20] or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.85–1.26; P = 0.76). The 12-month survival rates (95% CI) were 37.0% (30.9–43.1), 30.4% (24.7–36.3), and 30.5% (24.7–36.4) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were consistent with previous reports. The most common trAEs (any grade) were hypothyroidism for durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (11.4% and 12.2%, respectively), and anemia (17.5%) for SoC. Grade ≥3 trAE rates were 10.1%, 16.3%, and 24.2% for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and SoC, respectively. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in OS for durvalumab or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus SoC. However, higher survival rates at 12 to 24 months and response rates demonstrate clinical activity for durvalumab. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02369874.
KW - durvalumab
KW - head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
KW - immunotherapy
KW - metastatic
KW - randomized clinical trial
KW - tremelimumab
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084237800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 32294530
AN - SCOPUS:85084237800
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 31
SP - 942
EP - 950
JO - Annals of Oncology
JF - Annals of Oncology
IS - 7
ER -