TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy outcomes by baseline prostate-specific antigen quartile in the AFFIRM trial
AU - Saad, Fred
AU - De Bono, Johann
AU - Shore, Neal
AU - Fizazi, Karim
AU - Loriot, Yohann
AU - Hirmand, Mohammad
AU - Franks, Billy
AU - Haas, Gabriel P.
AU - Scher, Howard I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Background Enzalutamide significantly prolonged the survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) after docetaxel in the randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational Patients with Progressive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy (AFFIRM) trial (NCT00974311). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is commonly used as a marker of PCa disease burden, and the relationship of baseline PSA level to consequent treatment effect is of clinical interest. Objective Exploratory analysis to evaluate any differences in patient characteristics and efficacy outcomes by baseline PSA level in the AFFIRM trial. Design, setting, and participants Post hoc subanalysis of all randomised patients (n = 1199) from the AFFIRM trial. Intervention Participants were randomly assigned in a two-to-one ratio to receive oral enzalutamide 160 mg/d or placebo. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The major clinical efficacy end points were overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and time to PSA progression (TTPP) versus placebo; baseline characteristics, treatment duration, and subsequent antineoplastic therapy were compared by baseline PSA quartile. Results and limitations Baseline PSA quartiles corresponded to the following PSA groups: <40 ng/ml (n = 299), 40 to <111 ng/ml (n = 300), 111 to <406 ng/ml (n = 300), and ≥406 ng/ml (n = 300). Enzalutamide consistently improved OS, rPFS, and TTPP compared with placebo across all subgroups, regardless of baseline PSA level. Hazard ratios for improvements in OS were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.85), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.47-1.02), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.53-1.01), and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.39-0.73) for PSA groups 1-4, respectively. The post hoc design of this analysis was not statistically powered to assess the relationship between baseline PSA and clinical efficacy outcomes. Conclusions This post hoc analysis of the AFFIRM trial demonstrates consistent benefits in OS, rPFS, and TTPP with enzalutamide regardless of baseline disease severity, as assessed by PSA. Patient summary Exploratory post hoc analysis of the AFFIRM trial showed that enzalutamide improves overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival, and time to prostate-specific antigen progression compared with placebo regardless of baseline disease severity, as assessed by prostate-specific antigen. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00974311.
AB - Background Enzalutamide significantly prolonged the survival of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) after docetaxel in the randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational Patients with Progressive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy (AFFIRM) trial (NCT00974311). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is commonly used as a marker of PCa disease burden, and the relationship of baseline PSA level to consequent treatment effect is of clinical interest. Objective Exploratory analysis to evaluate any differences in patient characteristics and efficacy outcomes by baseline PSA level in the AFFIRM trial. Design, setting, and participants Post hoc subanalysis of all randomised patients (n = 1199) from the AFFIRM trial. Intervention Participants were randomly assigned in a two-to-one ratio to receive oral enzalutamide 160 mg/d or placebo. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The major clinical efficacy end points were overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and time to PSA progression (TTPP) versus placebo; baseline characteristics, treatment duration, and subsequent antineoplastic therapy were compared by baseline PSA quartile. Results and limitations Baseline PSA quartiles corresponded to the following PSA groups: <40 ng/ml (n = 299), 40 to <111 ng/ml (n = 300), 111 to <406 ng/ml (n = 300), and ≥406 ng/ml (n = 300). Enzalutamide consistently improved OS, rPFS, and TTPP compared with placebo across all subgroups, regardless of baseline PSA level. Hazard ratios for improvements in OS were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.85), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.47-1.02), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.53-1.01), and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.39-0.73) for PSA groups 1-4, respectively. The post hoc design of this analysis was not statistically powered to assess the relationship between baseline PSA and clinical efficacy outcomes. Conclusions This post hoc analysis of the AFFIRM trial demonstrates consistent benefits in OS, rPFS, and TTPP with enzalutamide regardless of baseline disease severity, as assessed by PSA. Patient summary Exploratory post hoc analysis of the AFFIRM trial showed that enzalutamide improves overall survival, radiographic progression-free survival, and time to prostate-specific antigen progression compared with placebo regardless of baseline disease severity, as assessed by prostate-specific antigen. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00974311.
KW - AFFIRM trial
KW - Androgen receptor inhibitor
KW - Enzalutamide
KW - Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
KW - Prostate-specific antigen
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920666284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.025
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.025
M3 - Article
C2 - 25171902
AN - SCOPUS:84920666284
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 67
SP - 223
EP - 230
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 2
ER -