TY - JOUR
T1 - ESMO study on the availability and accessibility of biomolecular technologies in oncology in Europe
AU - Bayle, A.
AU - Bonastre, J.
AU - Chaltiel, D.
AU - Latino, N.
AU - Rouleau, E.
AU - Peters, S.
AU - Galotti, M.
AU - Bricalli, G.
AU - Besse, B.
AU - Giuliani, R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 European Society for Medical Oncology
PY - 2023/10/1
Y1 - 2023/10/1
N2 - Background: Access to biomolecular technologies has become an essential requirement to ensure optimal and timely treatment of patients with cancer. This study sought to provide a comprehensive overview of the availability and accessibility of biomolecular technologies to patients, the status of their use and prescription, barriers to access, and potential economic issues related to cost and reimbursement. Materials and methods: A total of 201 field reporters from 48 European countries submitted data through an electronic survey tool between July and December 2021. The survey methodology mirrored that from previous ESMO studies addressing the availability and accessibility of antineoplastic medicines, in Europe and worldwide. The preliminary data were posted on the ESMO website for open peer-review, and amendments were incorporated into the final report. Results: Overall, basic single-gene techniques are widely available, whereas access to advanced biomolecular technologies, including large next-generation sequencing panels and complete genomic profiles, is highly heterogeneous. In most countries, advanced biomolecular technologies remain largely inaccessible in clinical practice, are limited to clinical trials or basic research, and associated with progressively increasing cost as the technique becomes more advanced. Differences also exist regarding national sequencing initiatives or molecular tumour boards. The most important barriers to multiple versus single-gene sequencing techniques are the reimbursement of the test (59% versus 24%), and the availability of a suitable medicine, either through reimbursement of treatment (48% versus 30%), off-label treatment (52% versus 35%), or clinical trial enrolment (53% versus 39%). Conclusions: Cost and availability of both treatment and test are the two main factors limiting patients’ access to advanced biomolecular technologies and as a consequence to innovative anticancer strategies. In the era of precision medicine, tackling the accessibility to biomolecular technologies is a key step to reduce inequalities to transformative cancer care.
AB - Background: Access to biomolecular technologies has become an essential requirement to ensure optimal and timely treatment of patients with cancer. This study sought to provide a comprehensive overview of the availability and accessibility of biomolecular technologies to patients, the status of their use and prescription, barriers to access, and potential economic issues related to cost and reimbursement. Materials and methods: A total of 201 field reporters from 48 European countries submitted data through an electronic survey tool between July and December 2021. The survey methodology mirrored that from previous ESMO studies addressing the availability and accessibility of antineoplastic medicines, in Europe and worldwide. The preliminary data were posted on the ESMO website for open peer-review, and amendments were incorporated into the final report. Results: Overall, basic single-gene techniques are widely available, whereas access to advanced biomolecular technologies, including large next-generation sequencing panels and complete genomic profiles, is highly heterogeneous. In most countries, advanced biomolecular technologies remain largely inaccessible in clinical practice, are limited to clinical trials or basic research, and associated with progressively increasing cost as the technique becomes more advanced. Differences also exist regarding national sequencing initiatives or molecular tumour boards. The most important barriers to multiple versus single-gene sequencing techniques are the reimbursement of the test (59% versus 24%), and the availability of a suitable medicine, either through reimbursement of treatment (48% versus 30%), off-label treatment (52% versus 35%), or clinical trial enrolment (53% versus 39%). Conclusions: Cost and availability of both treatment and test are the two main factors limiting patients’ access to advanced biomolecular technologies and as a consequence to innovative anticancer strategies. In the era of precision medicine, tackling the accessibility to biomolecular technologies is a key step to reduce inequalities to transformative cancer care.
KW - NGS
KW - access
KW - availability
KW - biomarkers
KW - biomolecular technologies
KW - cancer medicines
KW - oncology
KW - precision medicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165659699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.011
DO - 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 37406812
AN - SCOPUS:85165659699
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 34
SP - 934
EP - 945
JO - Annals of Oncology
JF - Annals of Oncology
IS - 10
ER -