Ethical issues in non-intervention trials for thyroid cancer

P. Angelos, D. M. Hartl, J. P. Shah, I. J. Nixon, R. P. Owen, A. Rinaldo, J. P. Rodrigo, A. R. Shaha, C. E. Silver, C. Suárez, A. Ferlito

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

2 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

In recent years, the increasing numbers of small, apparently indolent thyroid cancers diagnosed in the world have encouraged investigators to consider non-intervention as an alternative to surgical management. In the following pages, the prospect of a non-intervention trial for thyroid cancer is considered with attention to the ethical issues that such a trial might raise. Such a non-intervention trial is analyzed relative to 7 ethical considerations: the social or scientific value of the research, the scientific validity of the trial, the necessity of fair selection of participants, a favorable risk-benefit ratio for trial participants, independent review of the trial, informed consent, and allowing the study participants to withdraw from the trial. A non-intervention trial for thyroid cancer is also considered relative to the central concept of equipoise.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)316-320
Nombre de pages5
journalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume44
Numéro de publication3
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 mars 2018
Modification externeOui

Contient cette citation