European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors

Ulrika Joneborg, Alice Bergamini, Emelie Wallin, Giorgia Mangili, Olesya Solheim, Gloria Marquina, Antonio Casado, Erik Rokkones, John Coulter, Christianne A.R. Lok, Nienke Van Trommel, Frédéric Amant, Pierre Adrien Bolze, Jalid Sehouli, Sileny Han, Frédéric Kridelka, Frederic Goffin, Patricia Pautier, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Michael Seckl

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Objective To evaluate outcomes of European cross-border multidisciplinary tumor boards in terms of participation, adherence to treatment recommendations, and access to novel treatment strategies. Methods The European reference network for rare gynecological tumors (EURACAN G2 domain) aims to improve the diagnosis, management, and treatment of patients with these cancers. Cross-border multidisciplinary tumor boards were initiated to facilitate intercollegiate clinical discussions across Europe and increase patients' access to specialist treatment recommendations and clinical trials. All G2 healthcare providers were invited to participate in monthly multidisciplinary meetings. Patient data were collected using a standardized form and case summaries were distributed before each meeting. After each tumor board, a meeting summary with treatment recommendations was sent to all participants and the project manager at the coordinating center. The multidisciplinary tumor board format and outcomes were regularly discussed at G2 domain meetings. Anonymized clinical data and treatment recommendations were registered in a prospective database. For this report, clinical data were collected between November 2017 and December 2020 and follow-up data retrieved until May 2021. Results During the 3-year period, 31 multidisciplinary tumor boards were held with participants from 10 countries and 20 centers. 91 individual patients were discussed between one and six times for a total of 109 case discussions. Follow-up data were retrieved from 64 patients and 80 case discussions. Adherence to treatment recommendations was 99%. Multidisciplinary tumor board recommendations resulted in 11 patients getting access to off-label treatment and one patient being enrolled in a clinical trial in another European country. 14/91 patients were recommended for surveillance only when additional treatment had been considered locally. Conclusion Cross-border multidisciplinary tumor boards enable networking and clinical collaboration between healthcare professionals in different countries. Surveillance strategies, off-label drug use, and increased participation in clinical trials are possible benefits to patients with rare gynecological tumors.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)1621-1626
    Nombre de pages6
    journalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
    Volume33
    Numéro de publication10
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 oct. 2023

    Contient cette citation