TY - JOUR
T1 - Everolimus or sunitinib as first-line treatment of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma
T2 - A retrospective study of the GETUG group (Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Uro-Génitales)
AU - Cancel, Mathilde
AU - Fromont, Gaelle
AU - Blonz, Cyriac
AU - Chevreau, Christine
AU - Rioux-Leclercq, Nathalie
AU - Laguerre, Brigitte
AU - Oudard, Stéphane
AU - Gross-Goupil, Marine
AU - Gravis, Gwenaelle
AU - Goldwasser, François
AU - Rolland, Frédéric
AU - Delva, Rémy
AU - Moise, Laura
AU - Emambux, Sheik
AU - Vassal, Cécile
AU - Zanetta, Sylvie
AU - Penel, Nicolas
AU - Fléchon, Aude
AU - Barthélémy, Philippe
AU - Saldana, Carolina
AU - Lefort, Félix
AU - Escudier, Bernard
AU - Linassier, Claude
AU - Albiges, Laurence
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - Background: Two phase II trials (NCT00688753 and NCT00541008) reported efficacy data of sunitinib and everolimus in first-line treatment of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (mpRCC). Although most patients receive sunitinib or a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor in first- and second-line treatment, the optimal strategy remained unknown. Material and methods: In 23 centres of the Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Urogénitales group, after centralised pathological review, we analysed retrospectively progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with mpRCC treated in first-line treatment (PFS-1) with sunitinib or everolimus (primary end-point), PFS in second-line treatment (PFS-2), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), overall sequence and prognostic factors for OS (secondary end-points). Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients (119 men and 19 women), median age 62.5 years, with mpRCC type 1 (n = 24) or non–type 1 (n = 114), received first-line sunitinib (n = 107) or everolimus (n = 31). With a median follow-up of 92 months, we found no significant difference between the treatment groups in terms of PFS-1 (5.5 versus 6.2 months) and DCR (69% versus 83%). Ninety-eight patients received a second-line treatment, 69% with mTOR inhibitors after sunitinib and 100% with tyrosine kinase inhibitors after everolimus, with similar DCR (64% versus 58%), median PFS-2 (3.4 versus 4.8 months) and OS (16.0 versus 20.3 months). No factor was prognostic for PFS-1, whereas leukocytosis, anaemia and the time from diagnosis to first systemic therapy < 1 year were prognostic for OS. We found no prognostic difference between both pRCC subtypes. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Database Consortium risk factors were prognostic for OS. Conclusion: Sunitinib and everolimus had similar efficacy in first-line treatment of patients with mpRCC.
AB - Background: Two phase II trials (NCT00688753 and NCT00541008) reported efficacy data of sunitinib and everolimus in first-line treatment of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (mpRCC). Although most patients receive sunitinib or a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor in first- and second-line treatment, the optimal strategy remained unknown. Material and methods: In 23 centres of the Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Urogénitales group, after centralised pathological review, we analysed retrospectively progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with mpRCC treated in first-line treatment (PFS-1) with sunitinib or everolimus (primary end-point), PFS in second-line treatment (PFS-2), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), overall sequence and prognostic factors for OS (secondary end-points). Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients (119 men and 19 women), median age 62.5 years, with mpRCC type 1 (n = 24) or non–type 1 (n = 114), received first-line sunitinib (n = 107) or everolimus (n = 31). With a median follow-up of 92 months, we found no significant difference between the treatment groups in terms of PFS-1 (5.5 versus 6.2 months) and DCR (69% versus 83%). Ninety-eight patients received a second-line treatment, 69% with mTOR inhibitors after sunitinib and 100% with tyrosine kinase inhibitors after everolimus, with similar DCR (64% versus 58%), median PFS-2 (3.4 versus 4.8 months) and OS (16.0 versus 20.3 months). No factor was prognostic for PFS-1, whereas leukocytosis, anaemia and the time from diagnosis to first systemic therapy < 1 year were prognostic for OS. We found no prognostic difference between both pRCC subtypes. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Database Consortium risk factors were prognostic for OS. Conclusion: Sunitinib and everolimus had similar efficacy in first-line treatment of patients with mpRCC.
KW - Everolimus
KW - First-line treatment
KW - IMDC risk groups
KW - Metastatic
KW - Papillary renal cell carcinoma
KW - Prognostic factors
KW - Real world
KW - Sunitinib
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116329386&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.046
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.08.046
M3 - Article
C2 - 34619467
AN - SCOPUS:85116329386
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 158
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -