TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors influencing the decision to offer immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
T2 - The institut gustave roussy breast cancer study group experience
AU - Naoura, Iptissem
AU - Mazouni, Chafika
AU - Ghanimeh, Joseph
AU - Leymarie, Nicolas
AU - Garbay, Jean Rémi
AU - Karsenti, Guillaume
AU - Sarfati, Benjamin
AU - Leduey, Alexandre
AU - Kolb, Frédéric
AU - Delaloge, Suzette
AU - Rimareix, Françoise
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - Background: The increased rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with a rise in indications for mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the factors affecting the indications for IBR and its modalities. Study design: Data concerning two hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients with DCIS who had undergone modified radical mastectomy and a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 2005 and 2011 were extracted from our database. We then conducted a comparative study between patients who had undergone IBR and those who had not, to determine which factors affected the decision to offer IBR (LOE II). Results: About 57.1% had IBR and 42.9% had no reconstruction. The most common reason why IBR had not been performed was that it had not been proposed by the surgeon (33.4%). Of the 136 patients offered IBR, an implant had been proposed to the majority of them (81.6%). The IBR rate was highest among women under 50 years (52.2%), and was lower among women with diabetes (0.7%) or obesity (8.8%). The choice of reconstruction was not affected by tobacco use or positive SLNB results. Conclusion: Factors predictive of the IBR reflect the influence of surgeon counselling and, to a lesser extent, consideration of patient comorbidities. However, there is a need to improve patient information and physician referral.
AB - Background: The increased rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with a rise in indications for mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the factors affecting the indications for IBR and its modalities. Study design: Data concerning two hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients with DCIS who had undergone modified radical mastectomy and a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 2005 and 2011 were extracted from our database. We then conducted a comparative study between patients who had undergone IBR and those who had not, to determine which factors affected the decision to offer IBR (LOE II). Results: About 57.1% had IBR and 42.9% had no reconstruction. The most common reason why IBR had not been performed was that it had not been proposed by the surgeon (33.4%). Of the 136 patients offered IBR, an implant had been proposed to the majority of them (81.6%). The IBR rate was highest among women under 50 years (52.2%), and was lower among women with diabetes (0.7%) or obesity (8.8%). The choice of reconstruction was not affected by tobacco use or positive SLNB results. Conclusion: Factors predictive of the IBR reflect the influence of surgeon counselling and, to a lesser extent, consideration of patient comorbidities. However, there is a need to improve patient information and physician referral.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Breast implant
KW - Ductal carcinoma in situ
KW - Immediate breast reconstruction
KW - Mastectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884147434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 23357706
AN - SCOPUS:84884147434
SN - 0960-9776
VL - 22
SP - 673
EP - 675
JO - Breast
JF - Breast
IS - 5
ER -