TY - JOUR
T1 - First-Line Biological Agents Plus Chemotherapy in Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
T2 - A Retrospective Pooled Analysis
AU - on behalf of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD)
AU - García-Alfonso, Pilar
AU - Díaz-Rubio, Eduardo
AU - Abad, Albert
AU - Carrato, Alfredo
AU - Massutí, Bartomeu
AU - Ortiz-Morales, María José
AU - Manzano Mozo, José Luis
AU - Muñoz, Andrés
AU - Durán, Gema
AU - Sastre, Javier
AU - Safont, María José
AU - Ferreiro, Reyes
AU - Rivera, Fernando
AU - González, Encarnación
AU - Valladares-Ayerbes, Manuel
AU - Grávalos, Cristina
AU - Alonso-Orduña, Vicente
AU - Viéitez, José María
AU - Yubero, Alfonso
AU - Aranda, Enrique
AU - Abad, A.
AU - Manzano, J. L.
AU - Antón, A.
AU - Orduña, V. Alonso
AU - Arrivi, A.
AU - Falcó, E.
AU - Carrato, A.
AU - Longo-Muñoz, F.
AU - Guillén-Ponce, C.
AU - López, J. L.García
AU - Gallego, J.
AU - Lescure, A. Rodriguez
AU - Cervantes, A.
AU - Etxeberría, A.
AU - La Casta, A.
AU - López-Ladrón, A.
AU - Tapiador, A. M.García
AU - Ruiz, A.
AU - Salud, A.
AU - Ruiz, A. Sánchez
AU - Provencio, M.
AU - Velasco, A.
AU - Viudez, A.
AU - Arrazubi, V.
AU - Massutí, B.
AU - Yuste, A.
AU - Queralt, B.
AU - Hernández-Yagüe, X.
AU - Alonso, C.
AU - Remón, J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - Background: Biologicals, in combination with chemotherapy, are recommended as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, evidence guiding the appropriate management of older patients with mCRC is limited. Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes in older versus younger patients with mCRC who received first-line biological therapy. Methods: This retrospective analysis used pooled data from five trials undertaken by the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours. All were studies of adults with advanced CRC who received first-line treatment with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, cetuximab or panitumumab, stratified by age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 years). Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: In total, 999 patients from five studies were included in the analysis: 480 (48%) were aged ≥ 65 years, and 519 (52%) were aged < 65 years. Median PFS did not differ significantly between patients aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years (9.9 vs. 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.17). Median OS was significantly shorter in older than in younger patients (21.3 vs. 25.0 months; HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04–1.41). There was no significant difference between older and younger patients in ORR (59 vs. 62%). Patients aged ≥ 65 years experienced significantly more treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (61.67%) than did patients aged < 65 years (45.86%). Conclusions: Biologicals plus chemotherapy is an effective first-line treatment option for selected patients aged ≥ 65 years with mCRC and has a manageable safety profile and efficacy comparable to that observed in younger patients.
AB - Background: Biologicals, in combination with chemotherapy, are recommended as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, evidence guiding the appropriate management of older patients with mCRC is limited. Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes in older versus younger patients with mCRC who received first-line biological therapy. Methods: This retrospective analysis used pooled data from five trials undertaken by the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours. All were studies of adults with advanced CRC who received first-line treatment with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, cetuximab or panitumumab, stratified by age (≥ 65 vs. < 65 years). Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: In total, 999 patients from five studies were included in the analysis: 480 (48%) were aged ≥ 65 years, and 519 (52%) were aged < 65 years. Median PFS did not differ significantly between patients aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years (9.9 vs. 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–1.17). Median OS was significantly shorter in older than in younger patients (21.3 vs. 25.0 months; HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04–1.41). There was no significant difference between older and younger patients in ORR (59 vs. 62%). Patients aged ≥ 65 years experienced significantly more treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (61.67%) than did patients aged < 65 years (45.86%). Conclusions: Biologicals plus chemotherapy is an effective first-line treatment option for selected patients aged ≥ 65 years with mCRC and has a manageable safety profile and efficacy comparable to that observed in younger patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101228368&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40266-021-00834-w
DO - 10.1007/s40266-021-00834-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 33615402
AN - SCOPUS:85101228368
SN - 1170-229X
VL - 38
SP - 219
EP - 231
JO - Drugs and Aging
JF - Drugs and Aging
IS - 3
ER -