Gene- and pathway-level analyses of iCOGS variants highlight novel signaling pathways underlying familial breast cancer susceptibility

Christine Lonjou, Séverine Eon-Marchais, Thérèse Truong, Marie Gabrielle Dondon, Mojgan Karimi, Yue Jiao, Francesca Damiola, Laure Barjhoux, Dorothée Le Gal, Juana Beauvallet, Noura Mebirouk, Eve Cavaciuti, Jean Chiesa, Anne Floquet, Séverine Audebert-Bellanger, Sophie Giraud, Thierry Frebourg, Jean Marc Limacher, Laurence Gladieff, Isabelle MortemousqueHélène Dreyfus, Sophie Lejeune-Dumoulin, Christine Lasset, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Yves Jean Bignon, Pascal Pujol, Christine M. Maugard, Elisabeth Luporsi, Valérie Bonadona, Catherine Noguès, Pascaline Berthet, Capucine Delnatte, Paul Gesta, Alain Lortholary, Laurence Faivre, Bruno Buecher, Olivier Caron, Marion Gauthier-Villars, Isabelle Coupier, Sylvie Mazoyer, Luis Cristobal Monraz, Maria Kondratova, Inna Kuperstein, Pascal Guénel, Emmanuel Barillot, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Nadine Andrieu, Fabienne Lesueur

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in over 180 loci have been associated with breast cancer (BC) through genome-wide association studies involving mostly unselected population-based case-control series. Some of them modify BC risk of women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation and may also explain BC risk variability in BC-prone families with no BRCA1/2 mutation. Here, we assessed the contribution of SNPs of the iCOGS array in GENESIS consisting of BC cases with no BRCA1/2 mutation and a sister with BC, and population controls. Genotyping data were available for 1281 index cases, 731 sisters with BC, 457 unaffected sisters and 1272 controls. In addition to the standard SNP-level analysis using index cases and controls, we performed pedigree-based association tests to capture transmission information in the sibships. We also performed gene- and pathway-level analyses to maximize the power to detect associations with lower-frequency SNPs or those with modest effect sizes. While SNP-level analyses identified 18 loci, gene-level analyses identified 112 genes. Furthermore, 31 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and 7 Atlas of Cancer Signaling Network pathways were highlighted (false discovery rate of 5%). Using results from the “index case-control” analysis, we built pathway-derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) and assessed their performance in the population-based CECILE study and in a data set composed of GENESIS-affected sisters and CECILE controls. Although these PRS had poor predictive value in the general population, they performed better than a PRS built using our SNP-level findings, and we found that the joint effect of family history and PRS needs to be considered in risk prediction models.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)1895-1909
    Nombre de pages15
    journalInternational Journal of Cancer
    Volume148
    Numéro de publication8
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 15 avr. 2021

    Contient cette citation