Genetic identification of patients with AML older than 60 years achieving long-term survival with intensive chemotherapy

Raphael Itzykson, Elise Fournier, Céline Berthon, Christoph Röllig, Thorsten Braun, Alice Marceau-Renaut, Cécile Pautas, Olivier Nibourel, Emilie Lemasle, Jean Baptiste Micol, Lionel Adès, Delphine Lebon, Jean Valère Malfuson, Lauris Gastaud, Laure Goursaud, Emmanuel Raffoux, Kevin James Wattebled, Philippe Rousselot, Xavier Thomas, Sylvain ChantepieThomas Cluzeau, Hubert Serve, Nicolas Boissel, Christine Terré, Karine Celli-Lebras, Claude Preudhomme, Christian Thiede, Hervé Dombret, Claude Gardin, Nicolas Duployez

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    47 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    To design a simple and reproducible classifier predicting the overall survival (OS) of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ≥60 years of age treated with 7 + 3, we sequenced 37 genes in 471 patients from the ALFA1200 (Acute Leukemia French Association) study (median age, 68 years). Mutation patterns and OS differed between the 84 patients with poor-risk cytogenetics and the 387 patients with good (n = 13), intermediate (n = 339), or unmeasured (n = 35) cytogenetic risk. TP53 (hazards ratio [HR], 2.49; P = .0003) and KRAS (HR, 3.60; P = .001) mutations independently worsened the OS of patients with poor-risk cytogenetics. In those without poor-risk cytogenetics, NPM1 (HR, 0.57; P = .0004), FLT3 internal tandem duplications with low (HR, 1.85; P = .0005) or high (HR, 3.51; P < 10−4) allelic ratio, DNMT3A (HR, 1.86; P < 10−4), NRAS (HR, 1.54; P = .019), and ASXL1 (HR, 1.89; P = .0003) mutations independently predicted OS. Combining cytogenetic risk and mutations in these 7 genes, 39.1% of patients could be assigned to a “go-go” tier with a 2-year OS of 66.1%, 7.6% to the “no-go” group (2-year OS 2.8%), and 3.3% of to the “slow-go” group (2-year OS of 39.1%; P < 10−5). Across 3 independent validation cohorts, 31.2% to 37.7% and 11.2% to 13.5% of patients were assigned to the go-go and the no-go tiers, respectively, with significant differences in OS between tiers in all 3 trial cohorts (HDF [Hauts-de-France], n = 141, P = .003; and SAL [Study Alliance Leukemia], n = 46; AMLSG [AML Study Group], n = 223, both P < 10−5). The ALFA decision tool is a simple, robust, and discriminant prognostic model for AML patients ≥60 years of age treated with intensive chemotherapy. This model can instruct the design of trials comparing the 7 + 3 standard of care with less intensive regimens.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)507-519
    Nombre de pages13
    journalBlood
    Volume138
    Numéro de publication7
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 19 août 2021

    Contient cette citation