TY - JOUR
T1 - Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after intensive consolidation chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia
T2 - Results of a randomized trial of the Groupe Ouest-Est Leucemies Aigues Myeloblastiques
AU - Harousseau, J. L.
AU - Witz, B.
AU - Lioure, B.
AU - Hunault-Berger, M.
AU - Desablens, B.
AU - Delain, M.
AU - Guilhot, F.
AU - Le Prise, P. Y.
AU - Abgrall, J. F.
AU - Deconinck, E.
AU - Guyotat, D.
AU - Vilque, J. P.
AU - Casassus, P.
AU - Tournilhac, O.
AU - Audhuy, B.
AU - Solary, E.
PY - 2000/1/1
Y1 - 2000/1/1
N2 - Purpose: Ten years after the first clinical studies, the clinical impact of myeloid growth factors in acute myeloid leukemia is still unclear. One of the objectives of the Groupe Ouest-Est Leucemies Aigues Myeloblastiques (GOELAM) 2 trial was to evaluate the benefit of granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (GCSF) given only after the two courses of intensive consolidation chemotherapy (ICC) used to maintain complete remission (CR). Patients and Methods: One hundred ninety-four patients who were in CR after induction treatment were randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (100 patients) or no G-CSF (94 patients) after two courses of ICC (ICC 1, high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone; ICC 2, amsacrine plus etoposide). G-CSF (filgrastim) was administered from the day after chemotherapy until granulocyte recovery at a daily dose of 5 μg/kg. Results: In the G-CSF group, the median duration of neutropenia (< 0.5 x 109/L) was dramatically reduced, both after ICC 1 (12 v 19 days, P < .001) and after ICC 2 (20 v 28 days, P < .001). The median duration of hospitalization was also significantly shorter in the G-CSF group (24 v 27 days after ICC 1, P < .001; 29 v 34 days after ICC 2, P < .001). The median duration of intravenous antibiotics was significantly reduced after ICC 1 and ICC 2, and the median duration of antifungal therapy was significantly reduced after ICC 1. However, the incidence of microbiologically documented infections, the toxic death rate, the 2-year disease-free survival, and the 2-year overall survival were not affected by G-CSF administration. Moreover, the median interval between ICC1 and ICC2 was reduced by only 2 days, and the number of patients undergoing ICC2 was not increased in the G-CSF arm. Conclusion: G-CSF should be administered routinely after ICC to reduce the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization. However, G-CSF did not seem to significantly increase the feasibility of this two-course program or modify overall outcome. (C) 2000 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
AB - Purpose: Ten years after the first clinical studies, the clinical impact of myeloid growth factors in acute myeloid leukemia is still unclear. One of the objectives of the Groupe Ouest-Est Leucemies Aigues Myeloblastiques (GOELAM) 2 trial was to evaluate the benefit of granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (GCSF) given only after the two courses of intensive consolidation chemotherapy (ICC) used to maintain complete remission (CR). Patients and Methods: One hundred ninety-four patients who were in CR after induction treatment were randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (100 patients) or no G-CSF (94 patients) after two courses of ICC (ICC 1, high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone; ICC 2, amsacrine plus etoposide). G-CSF (filgrastim) was administered from the day after chemotherapy until granulocyte recovery at a daily dose of 5 μg/kg. Results: In the G-CSF group, the median duration of neutropenia (< 0.5 x 109/L) was dramatically reduced, both after ICC 1 (12 v 19 days, P < .001) and after ICC 2 (20 v 28 days, P < .001). The median duration of hospitalization was also significantly shorter in the G-CSF group (24 v 27 days after ICC 1, P < .001; 29 v 34 days after ICC 2, P < .001). The median duration of intravenous antibiotics was significantly reduced after ICC 1 and ICC 2, and the median duration of antifungal therapy was significantly reduced after ICC 1. However, the incidence of microbiologically documented infections, the toxic death rate, the 2-year disease-free survival, and the 2-year overall survival were not affected by G-CSF administration. Moreover, the median interval between ICC1 and ICC2 was reduced by only 2 days, and the number of patients undergoing ICC2 was not increased in the G-CSF arm. Conclusion: G-CSF should be administered routinely after ICC to reduce the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization. However, G-CSF did not seem to significantly increase the feasibility of this two-course program or modify overall outcome. (C) 2000 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033957073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/jco.2000.18.4.780
DO - 10.1200/jco.2000.18.4.780
M3 - Article
C2 - 10673519
AN - SCOPUS:0033957073
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 18
SP - 780
EP - 787
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 4
ER -