TY - JOUR
T1 - Haemodynamic management during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Bezu, Lucillia
AU - Raineau, Mégane
AU - Deloménie, Myriam
AU - Cholley, Bernard
AU - Pirracchio, Romain
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar)
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Context: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a surgical technique for peritoneal carcinomatosis combining cytoreduction surgery and peritoneal irrigation of cytotoxic agents responsible for haemodynamics and fluid homeostasis alterations. To this day, no guidelines exist concerning intraoperative management. Objectives: To review data on haemodynamic monitoring and management of patients undergoing HIPEC and to help design a standardised anaesthetic protocol. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library were searched using the following. Study selection: Original articles and case-reports. Letters to editors and reviews were excluded. Data extraction: Data on haemodynamic management, morbidity and mortality. Data synthesis: Haemodynamic management during HIPEC is highly variable and depends on local protocols. Only one randomised controlled trial evaluated the benefit of goal-directed fluid administration (GDFA). GDFA guided by advanced haemodynamic monitoring resulted in significantly less complication, shorter length of stay and less mortality compared to standard fluid administration. Renal protection protocol did not decrease the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Conclusion: Our review reveals that fluid administration guided by advanced monitoring seems to be associated with less postoperative morbidity and mortality after HIPEC. Nevertheless, the literature review shows that intraoperative haemodynamic management is highly variable for this surgery. The use of renal protection strategy does not decrease the prevalence of AKI.
AB - Context: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a surgical technique for peritoneal carcinomatosis combining cytoreduction surgery and peritoneal irrigation of cytotoxic agents responsible for haemodynamics and fluid homeostasis alterations. To this day, no guidelines exist concerning intraoperative management. Objectives: To review data on haemodynamic monitoring and management of patients undergoing HIPEC and to help design a standardised anaesthetic protocol. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library were searched using the following. Study selection: Original articles and case-reports. Letters to editors and reviews were excluded. Data extraction: Data on haemodynamic management, morbidity and mortality. Data synthesis: Haemodynamic management during HIPEC is highly variable and depends on local protocols. Only one randomised controlled trial evaluated the benefit of goal-directed fluid administration (GDFA). GDFA guided by advanced haemodynamic monitoring resulted in significantly less complication, shorter length of stay and less mortality compared to standard fluid administration. Renal protection protocol did not decrease the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Conclusion: Our review reveals that fluid administration guided by advanced monitoring seems to be associated with less postoperative morbidity and mortality after HIPEC. Nevertheless, the literature review shows that intraoperative haemodynamic management is highly variable for this surgery. The use of renal protection strategy does not decrease the prevalence of AKI.
KW - Anaesthesia
KW - Fluid administration
KW - Haemodynamic monitoring
KW - Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
KW - Management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085641304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.019
DO - 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.019
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32320757
AN - SCOPUS:85085641304
SN - 2352-5568
VL - 39
SP - 531
EP - 542
JO - Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine
JF - Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine
IS - 4
ER -