TY - JOUR
T1 - Health-related quality of life impact in a randomised phase III study of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 metastatic melanoma
AU - Schadendorf, Dirk
AU - Amonkar, Mayur M.
AU - Stroyakovskiy, Daniil
AU - Levchenko, Evgeny
AU - Gogas, Helen
AU - De Braud, Filippo
AU - Grob, Jean Jacques
AU - Bondarenko, Igor
AU - Garbe, Claus
AU - Lebbe, Celeste
AU - Larkin, James
AU - Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna
AU - Millward, Michael
AU - Arance, Ana
AU - Mandalà, Mario
AU - Flaherty, Keith T.
AU - Nathan, Paul
AU - Ribas, Antoni
AU - Robert, Caroline
AU - Casey, Michelle
AU - Demarini, Douglas J.
AU - Irani, Jhangir G.
AU - Aktan, Gursel
AU - Long, Georgina V.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - Aim To present the impact of treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from the double-blind, randomised phase III COMBI-d study that investigated the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. COMBI-d showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival for the combination. Methods HRQoL was evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, a generic cancer questionnaire (completed at baseline, during study treatment, at progression and post progression) assessing various dimensions (global health/QoL, functional status, and symptom impact). A mixed-model, repeated-measures analyses of covariance evaluated differences between arms. Results Questionnaire completion rates were >95% at baseline, >85% to week 40 and >70% at disease progression. Baseline scores across both arms were comparable for all dimensions. Global health dimension scores were significantly better at weeks 8, 16 and 24 for patients receiving the combination during treatment and at progression. The majority of functional dimension scores (physical, social, role, emotional and cognitive functioning) trended in favour of the combination. Pain scores were significantly improved and clinically meaningful (6-13 point difference) for patients receiving the combination for all follow-up assessments versus those receiving dabrafenib monotherapy. For other symptom dimensions (nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, and constipation), scores trended in favour of dabrafenib monotherapy. Conclusion This analysis demonstrates that the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib provides better preservation of HRQoL and pain improvements versus dabrafenib monotherapy while also delaying progression. (Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01584648).
AB - Aim To present the impact of treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from the double-blind, randomised phase III COMBI-d study that investigated the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. COMBI-d showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival for the combination. Methods HRQoL was evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, a generic cancer questionnaire (completed at baseline, during study treatment, at progression and post progression) assessing various dimensions (global health/QoL, functional status, and symptom impact). A mixed-model, repeated-measures analyses of covariance evaluated differences between arms. Results Questionnaire completion rates were >95% at baseline, >85% to week 40 and >70% at disease progression. Baseline scores across both arms were comparable for all dimensions. Global health dimension scores were significantly better at weeks 8, 16 and 24 for patients receiving the combination during treatment and at progression. The majority of functional dimension scores (physical, social, role, emotional and cognitive functioning) trended in favour of the combination. Pain scores were significantly improved and clinically meaningful (6-13 point difference) for patients receiving the combination for all follow-up assessments versus those receiving dabrafenib monotherapy. For other symptom dimensions (nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, and constipation), scores trended in favour of dabrafenib monotherapy. Conclusion This analysis demonstrates that the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib provides better preservation of HRQoL and pain improvements versus dabrafenib monotherapy while also delaying progression. (Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01584648).
KW - B-raf
KW - Dabrafenib
KW - Melanoma
KW - Molecular targeted
KW - Protein kinase inhibitors
KW - Proto-oncogene proteins
KW - Trametinib
KW - therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927513281&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 25794603
AN - SCOPUS:84927513281
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 51
SP - 833
EP - 840
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
IS - 7
ER -