TY - JOUR
T1 - High sensitivity of the Hematoflow™ solution for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia screening
AU - on behalf of the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (GFM)
AU - Vazquez, Romain
AU - Roussel, Mikael
AU - Badaoui, Bouchra
AU - Freynet, Nicolas
AU - Tarfi, Sihem
AU - Solary, Eric
AU - Selimoglu-Buet, Dorothée
AU - Wagner-Ballon, Orianne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Clinical Cytometry Society
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Background: Accumulation of classical monocytes CD14 ++ CD16 – (also called MO1) ≥ 94% can accurately distinguish chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) from reactive monocytosis. The HematoFlow™ solution, able to quantify CD16 negative monocytes, could be a useful tool to manage monocytosis which remains a common issue in routine laboratories. Methods: Classical monocytes were quantified from 153 whole blood samples collected on EDTA using both flow cytometry methods, either MO1 percentage determination by the multiparameter assay previously published and regarded here as the reference method, or CD16 negative monocyte percentage determination by the means of HematoFlow™. Results: Both methods of classical monocyte percentage determination were highly and significantly correlated (r = 0.87, P < 0.0001). The HematoFlow™ solution leant toward an overestimation of the genuine classical monocyte percentages obtained by the reference method. Percentages of CD16 negative monocytes provided by HematoFlow were higher than 94% for all the 73 patients displaying classical monocytes MO1 found ≥94% by the reference method, indicating a sensitivity of 100%. Furthermore, the calculation of CD16 negative monocyte percentage can be easily computerized and integrated to the middleware. Conclusions: We propose a new application of the Hematoflow™ solution that can be used as a flag system for monocytosis management and CMML detection.
AB - Background: Accumulation of classical monocytes CD14 ++ CD16 – (also called MO1) ≥ 94% can accurately distinguish chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) from reactive monocytosis. The HematoFlow™ solution, able to quantify CD16 negative monocytes, could be a useful tool to manage monocytosis which remains a common issue in routine laboratories. Methods: Classical monocytes were quantified from 153 whole blood samples collected on EDTA using both flow cytometry methods, either MO1 percentage determination by the multiparameter assay previously published and regarded here as the reference method, or CD16 negative monocyte percentage determination by the means of HematoFlow™. Results: Both methods of classical monocyte percentage determination were highly and significantly correlated (r = 0.87, P < 0.0001). The HematoFlow™ solution leant toward an overestimation of the genuine classical monocyte percentages obtained by the reference method. Percentages of CD16 negative monocytes provided by HematoFlow were higher than 94% for all the 73 patients displaying classical monocytes MO1 found ≥94% by the reference method, indicating a sensitivity of 100%. Furthermore, the calculation of CD16 negative monocyte percentage can be easily computerized and integrated to the middleware. Conclusions: We propose a new application of the Hematoflow™ solution that can be used as a flag system for monocytosis management and CMML detection.
KW - Hematoflow
KW - chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
KW - classical monocyte accumulation
KW - flow cytometry
KW - reactive monocytosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034240361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cyto.b.21600
DO - 10.1002/cyto.b.21600
M3 - Article
C2 - 29108126
AN - SCOPUS:85034240361
SN - 1552-4949
VL - 94
SP - 658
EP - 661
JO - Cytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry
JF - Cytometry Part B - Clinical Cytometry
IS - 5
ER -