TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of postprogression therapies on overall survival
T2 - Recommendations from the 2023 kidney cancer association think tank meeting
AU - Berg, Stephanie A.
AU - La Rosa, Salvatore
AU - Zhang, Tian
AU - Pierorazio, Phillip M.
AU - Albiges, Laurence
AU - Beckermann, Kathryn E.
AU - Campbell, Matthew T.
AU - Carlo, Maria I.
AU - Coleman, Katie
AU - George, Daniel J.
AU - Geynisman, Daniel M.
AU - Johnson, Ritchie
AU - Jonasch, Eric
AU - Maranchie, Jodi K.
AU - McGregor, Bradley A.
AU - Shapiro, Daniel D.
AU - Singer, Eric A.
AU - Shuch, Brian M.
AU - Stadler, Walter M.
AU - Tannir, Nizar M.
AU - Zakharia, Yousef
AU - Vaishampayan, Ulka N.
AU - Thall, Peter F.
AU - Msaouel, Pavlos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Modern advances in systemic and localized therapies for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have significantly improved patients’ outcomes. If disease progression occurs after initial treatment, clinicians often have multiple options for a first salvage therapy. Because salvage and initial treatments both may affect overall survival time, and they may interact in unanticipated ways, there is a growing need to determine sequences of initial therapy and first salvage therapy that maximize overall survival while maintaining quality of life. The complexity of this problem grows if a second salvage therapy must be chosen for patients with treatment-resistant disease or a second progression occurs following first salvage. On November 9, 2023, a think tank was convened during the International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS) North America to discuss challenges in accounting for postprogression therapies when estimating overall survival (OS) time based on randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. The present manuscript summarizes the topics discussed, with the aim to encourage adoption of statistical methods that account for salvage therapy effects to obtain scientifically valid OS estimation. We highlight limitations of traditional methods for estimating OS that account for initial treatments while ignoring salvage therapy effects and discuss advantages of applying more sophisticated statistical methods for estimation and trial design. These include identifying multistage treatment strategies, correcting for confounding due to salvage therapy effects, and conducting Sequentially Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) to obtain unbiased comparisons between multistage strategies. We emphasize the critical role of patient input in trial design, and the potential for information technology (IT) advances to support complex trial designs and real-time data analyses. By addressing these challenges, future RCTs can better inform clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in RCC.
AB - Modern advances in systemic and localized therapies for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have significantly improved patients’ outcomes. If disease progression occurs after initial treatment, clinicians often have multiple options for a first salvage therapy. Because salvage and initial treatments both may affect overall survival time, and they may interact in unanticipated ways, there is a growing need to determine sequences of initial therapy and first salvage therapy that maximize overall survival while maintaining quality of life. The complexity of this problem grows if a second salvage therapy must be chosen for patients with treatment-resistant disease or a second progression occurs following first salvage. On November 9, 2023, a think tank was convened during the International Kidney Cancer Symposium (IKCS) North America to discuss challenges in accounting for postprogression therapies when estimating overall survival (OS) time based on randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. The present manuscript summarizes the topics discussed, with the aim to encourage adoption of statistical methods that account for salvage therapy effects to obtain scientifically valid OS estimation. We highlight limitations of traditional methods for estimating OS that account for initial treatments while ignoring salvage therapy effects and discuss advantages of applying more sophisticated statistical methods for estimation and trial design. These include identifying multistage treatment strategies, correcting for confounding due to salvage therapy effects, and conducting Sequentially Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) to obtain unbiased comparisons between multistage strategies. We emphasize the critical role of patient input in trial design, and the potential for information technology (IT) advances to support complex trial designs and real-time data analyses. By addressing these challenges, future RCTs can better inform clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in RCC.
KW - Adaptive treatment strategy
KW - Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)
KW - dynamic treatment regime
KW - multistage treatment strategy
KW - overall survival
KW - postprogression therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85208227258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.022
DO - 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.022
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85208227258
SN - 1078-1439
JO - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
JF - Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
ER -