TY - JOUR
T1 - Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma
AU - MANATEC-02 collaborative group
AU - Faron, Matthieu
AU - Cheugoua-Zanetsie, Maurice
AU - Tierney, Jayne
AU - Thirion, Pierre
AU - Nankivell, Matthew
AU - Winter, Kathryn
AU - Yang, Hong
AU - Shapiro, Joel
AU - Vernerey, Dewi
AU - Smithers, B. Mark
AU - Walsh, Thomas
AU - Piessen, Guillaume
AU - Nilsson, Magnus
AU - Boonstra, Jurjen
AU - Ychou, Marc
AU - Law, Simon
AU - Cunningham, David
AU - De Vathaire, Florent
AU - Stahl, Michael
AU - Urba, Susan
AU - Valmasoni, Michele
AU - Williaume, Danièle
AU - Thomas, Janine
AU - Lordick, Florian
AU - Tepper, Joel
AU - Roth, Jack
AU - Gebski, Val
AU - Burmeister, Bryan
AU - Paoletti, Xavier
AU - Van Sandick, Johanna
AU - Fu, Jianhua
AU - Pignon, Jean Pierre
AU - Ducreux, Michel
AU - Michiels, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2023/10/1
Y1 - 2023/10/1
N2 - Purpose: The optimal neoadjuvant treatment for resectable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (TE) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains a matter of debate. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to study the effect of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, with a focus on tumor location and histology subgroups. Patients and Methodsall, published or unpublished, RCTs closed to accrual before December 31, 2015 and having compared at least two of the following strategies were eligible: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). All analyses were conducted on IPD obtained from investigators. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The IPD-NMA was analyzed by a one-step mixed-effect Cox model adjusted for age, sex, tumor location, and histology. The NMA was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107158). Results: IPD were obtained for 26 of 35 RCTs (4,985 of 5,807 patients) corresponding to 12 comparisons for CS-S, 12 for CRS-S, and four for CRS-CS. CS and CRS led to increased OS when compared with S with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86 (0.75 to 0.99), P =.03 and HR = 0.77 (0.68 to 0.87), P <.001 respectively. The NMA comparison of CRS versus CS for OS gave a HR of 0.90 (0.74 to 1.09), P =.27 (consistency P =.26, heterogeneity P =.0038). For CS versus S, a larger effect on OS was observed for GEJ versus TE tumors (P =.036). For the CRS versus S and CRS versus CS, a larger effect on OS was observed for women (P =.003,.012, respectively). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were consistently better than S alone across histology, but with some variation in the magnitude of treatment effect by sex for CRS and tumor location for CS. A strong OS difference between CS and CRS was not identified.
AB - Purpose: The optimal neoadjuvant treatment for resectable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (TE) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains a matter of debate. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to study the effect of chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, with a focus on tumor location and histology subgroups. Patients and Methodsall, published or unpublished, RCTs closed to accrual before December 31, 2015 and having compared at least two of the following strategies were eligible: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). All analyses were conducted on IPD obtained from investigators. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The IPD-NMA was analyzed by a one-step mixed-effect Cox model adjusted for age, sex, tumor location, and histology. The NMA was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107158). Results: IPD were obtained for 26 of 35 RCTs (4,985 of 5,807 patients) corresponding to 12 comparisons for CS-S, 12 for CRS-S, and four for CRS-CS. CS and CRS led to increased OS when compared with S with hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86 (0.75 to 0.99), P =.03 and HR = 0.77 (0.68 to 0.87), P <.001 respectively. The NMA comparison of CRS versus CS for OS gave a HR of 0.90 (0.74 to 1.09), P =.27 (consistency P =.26, heterogeneity P =.0038). For CS versus S, a larger effect on OS was observed for GEJ versus TE tumors (P =.036). For the CRS versus S and CRS versus CS, a larger effect on OS was observed for women (P =.003,.012, respectively). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy were consistently better than S alone across histology, but with some variation in the magnitude of treatment effect by sex for CRS and tumor location for CS. A strong OS difference between CS and CRS was not identified.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172739872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.22.02279
DO - 10.1200/JCO.22.02279
M3 - Article
C2 - 37467395
AN - SCOPUS:85172739872
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 41
SP - 4535
EP - 4547
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 28
ER -