TY - JOUR
T1 - Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy (CA184-043)
T2 - A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial
AU - Kwon, Eugene D.
AU - Drake, Charles G.
AU - Scher, Howard I.
AU - Fizazi, Karim
AU - Bossi, Alberto
AU - Van den Eertwegh, Alfons J.M.
AU - Krainer, Michael
AU - Houede, Nadine
AU - Santos, Ricardo
AU - Mahammedi, Hakim
AU - Ng, Siobhan
AU - Maio, Michele
AU - Franke, Fabio A.
AU - Sundar, Santhanam
AU - Agarwal, Neeraj
AU - Bergman, Andries M.
AU - Ciuleanu, Tudor E.
AU - Korbenfeld, Ernesto
AU - Sengeløv, Lisa
AU - Hansen, Steinbjorn
AU - Logothetis, Christopher
AU - Beer, Tomasz M.
AU - McHenry, M. Brent
AU - Gagnier, Paul
AU - Liu, David
AU - Gerritsen, Winald R.
N1 - Funding Information:
EDK has received technology royalties and licence payments from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and has donated payments related to participation in a Bristol-Myers Squibb publication steering committee to his institution. CGD has received consultant fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Pfizer, Compugen, and Janssen. HIS has served as an uncompensated consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb and his institution received non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb during the study. He has also received consultant fees from Dendreon and Takeda Millennium; donated consultant fees from Ortho Biotech Oncology Research & Development to his institution; been an uncompensated consultant for Aragon, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals & Development, Medivation, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and received research support (to his institution) from Aragon, Medivation, Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Services, and Veridex. KF has received consultant fees and lecture fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb. AB received grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb during the study and has received consultant fees from Astellas and Janssen, as well as non-financial support from ISSECAM (unrelated to the present report). AJME has received consultant fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas, Sanofi, and Janssen-Cilag. NH has received consultant fees from Sanofi, Janssen, Astellas, Takeda, Ipsen, and Pierre Fabre, and grant support from Astellas. HM has received payments for educational presentations from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, and Amgen. He has also served on boards for Amgen and Sanofi-Aventis and has received travel support from Amgen, Novartis, Bayer, Pfizer, and Roche. MM received patients' fees for Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese (Siena, Italy) during the study. He has also received research grants for investigator-sponsored trials from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and consultant fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Roche for serving on boards. SS has received honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer, and Astellas; non-financial support from Sanofi-Aventis; and conference sponsorship (non-financial support) from Janssen. NA has received honoraria from Dendreon and research support to his institution from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, ImClone Systems, Medivation, Millennium, Novartis, and Pfizer. TEC has received fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb for consultancy, lectures, and serving on a board. LS received grants and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb during the study. She has also received grants and non-financial support from Sanofi-Aventis and Ipsen (unrelated to the present report). SH received consultant fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb during the study. TMB received grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb during the study. MBM, PG, and DL are employees of Bristol-Myers Squibb. WRG received reimbursement for travel expenses from Bristol-Myers Squibb during the study, has received speaker fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Janssen-Cilag, and has received consultant fees for serving on boards for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas, and Janssen-Cilag. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Background: Ipilimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 to enhance antitumour immunity. Our aim was to assess the use of ipilimumab after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in which men with at least one bone metastasis from castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel treatment were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive bone-directed radiotherapy (8 Gy in one fraction) followed by either ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Non-progressing patients could continue to receive ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg or placebo as maintenance therapy every 3 months until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effect, or death. Patients were randomly assigned to either treatment group via a minimisation algorithm, and stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, alkaline phosphatase concentration, haemoglobin concentration, and investigator site. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00861614. Findings: From May 26, 2009, to Feb 15, 2012, 799 patients were randomly assigned (399 to ipilimumab and 400 to placebo), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median overall survival was 11·2 months (95% CI 9·5-12·7) with ipilimumab and 10·0 months (8·3-11·0) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 0·72-1·00; p=0·053). However, the assessment of the proportional hazards assumption showed that it was violated (p=0·0031). A piecewise hazard model showed that the HR changed over time: the HR for 0-5 months was 1·46 (95% CI 1·10-1·95), for 5-12 months was 0·65 (0·50-0·85), and beyond 12 months was 0·60 (0·43-0·86). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were immune-related, occurring in 101 (26%) patients in the ipilimumab group and 11 (3%) of patients in the placebo group. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events included diarrhoea (64 [16%] of 393 patients in the ipilimumab group vs seven [2%] of 396 in the placebo group), fatigue (40 [11%] vs 35 [9%]), anaemia (40 [10%] vs 43 [11%]), and colitis (18 [5%] vs 0). Four (1%) deaths occurred because of toxic effects of the study drug, all in the ipilimumab group. Interpretation: Although there was no significant difference between the ipilimumab group and the placebo group in terms of overall survival in the primary analysis, there were signs of activity with the drug that warrant further investigation. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb.
AB - Background: Ipilimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 to enhance antitumour immunity. Our aim was to assess the use of ipilimumab after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy. Methods: We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in which men with at least one bone metastasis from castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel treatment were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive bone-directed radiotherapy (8 Gy in one fraction) followed by either ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Non-progressing patients could continue to receive ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg or placebo as maintenance therapy every 3 months until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effect, or death. Patients were randomly assigned to either treatment group via a minimisation algorithm, and stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, alkaline phosphatase concentration, haemoglobin concentration, and investigator site. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00861614. Findings: From May 26, 2009, to Feb 15, 2012, 799 patients were randomly assigned (399 to ipilimumab and 400 to placebo), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median overall survival was 11·2 months (95% CI 9·5-12·7) with ipilimumab and 10·0 months (8·3-11·0) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 0·72-1·00; p=0·053). However, the assessment of the proportional hazards assumption showed that it was violated (p=0·0031). A piecewise hazard model showed that the HR changed over time: the HR for 0-5 months was 1·46 (95% CI 1·10-1·95), for 5-12 months was 0·65 (0·50-0·85), and beyond 12 months was 0·60 (0·43-0·86). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were immune-related, occurring in 101 (26%) patients in the ipilimumab group and 11 (3%) of patients in the placebo group. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events included diarrhoea (64 [16%] of 393 patients in the ipilimumab group vs seven [2%] of 396 in the placebo group), fatigue (40 [11%] vs 35 [9%]), anaemia (40 [10%] vs 43 [11%]), and colitis (18 [5%] vs 0). Four (1%) deaths occurred because of toxic effects of the study drug, all in the ipilimumab group. Interpretation: Although there was no significant difference between the ipilimumab group and the placebo group in terms of overall survival in the primary analysis, there were signs of activity with the drug that warrant further investigation. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901641673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70189-5
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70189-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 24831977
AN - SCOPUS:84901641673
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 15
SP - 700
EP - 712
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 7
ER -