TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Term Overall Survival After Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinomas
T2 - Updated Analysis of DOSISPHERE-01 Trial
AU - Garin, Etienne
AU - Tselikas, Lambros
AU - Guiu, Boris
AU - Chalaye, Julia
AU - Rolland, Yan
AU - de Baere, Thierry
AU - Assenat, Eric
AU - Tacher, Vania
AU - Palard, Xavier
AU - Deandreis, Desiree
AU - Mariano-Goulart, Denis
AU - Amaddeo, Giuliana
AU - Boudjema, Karim
AU - Hollebecque, Antoine
AU - Meerun, Mohamad Azhar
AU - Regnault, Helen
AU - Vibert, Eric
AU - Campillo-Gimenez, Boris
AU - Edeline, Julien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
PY - 2024/2/10
Y1 - 2024/2/10
N2 - Interim analysis of the DOSISPHERE-01 study demonstrated a strong improvement in response and overall survival (OS) on using 90Y-loaded glass microspheres with personalized dosimetry compared with standard dosimetry in patients with nonoperable locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This report sought to provide a long-term analysis of OS. Methods: In this phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02582034), treatment was randomly assigned (1:1) with the goal to deliver either at least 205 Gy (if possible .250–300 Gy) to the index lesion in the personalized dosimetry approach (PDA) or 120 6 20 Gy to the treated volume in the standard dosimetry approach (SDA). The 3-mo response of the index lesion was the primary endpoint, with OS being one of the secondary endpoints. This report is a post hoc long-term analysis of OS. Results: Overall, 60 hepatocellular carcinoma patients with at least 1 lesion larger than 7 cm and more than 30% of hepatic reserve were randomized (intent-to-treat population: PDA, n 5 31; SDA, n 5 29), with 56 actually treated (modified intent-to-treat population: n 5 28 in each arm). The median follow-up for long-term analysis was 65.8 mo (range, 2.1–73.1 mo). Median OS was 24.8 mo and 10.7 mo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29–0.9; P 5 0.02) for PDA and SDA, respectively, in the modified intent-to-treat population. Median OS was 22.9 mo for patients with a tumor dose of at least 205 Gy, versus 10.3 mo for those with a tumor dose of less than 205 Gy (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22–0.81; P 5 0.0095), and was 22.9 mo for patients with a perfused liver dose of 150 Gy or higher, versus 10.3 mo for those with a perfused liver dose of less than 150 Gy (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23–0.75; P 5 0.0033). Lastly, median OS was not reached in patients who were secondarily resected (n 5 11, 10 in the PDA group and 1 in the SDA group), versus 10.8 mo in those without secondary resection (n 5 45) (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.065–0.43; P 5 0.0002). Only resected patients displayed favorable long-term OS rates, meaning an OS of more than 50% at 5 y. Conclusion: After longer follow-up, personalized dosimetry sustained a meaningful improvement in OS, which was dramatically improved for patients who were accurately downstaged toward resection, including most portal vein thrombosis patients.
AB - Interim analysis of the DOSISPHERE-01 study demonstrated a strong improvement in response and overall survival (OS) on using 90Y-loaded glass microspheres with personalized dosimetry compared with standard dosimetry in patients with nonoperable locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. This report sought to provide a long-term analysis of OS. Methods: In this phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02582034), treatment was randomly assigned (1:1) with the goal to deliver either at least 205 Gy (if possible .250–300 Gy) to the index lesion in the personalized dosimetry approach (PDA) or 120 6 20 Gy to the treated volume in the standard dosimetry approach (SDA). The 3-mo response of the index lesion was the primary endpoint, with OS being one of the secondary endpoints. This report is a post hoc long-term analysis of OS. Results: Overall, 60 hepatocellular carcinoma patients with at least 1 lesion larger than 7 cm and more than 30% of hepatic reserve were randomized (intent-to-treat population: PDA, n 5 31; SDA, n 5 29), with 56 actually treated (modified intent-to-treat population: n 5 28 in each arm). The median follow-up for long-term analysis was 65.8 mo (range, 2.1–73.1 mo). Median OS was 24.8 mo and 10.7 mo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29–0.9; P 5 0.02) for PDA and SDA, respectively, in the modified intent-to-treat population. Median OS was 22.9 mo for patients with a tumor dose of at least 205 Gy, versus 10.3 mo for those with a tumor dose of less than 205 Gy (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22–0.81; P 5 0.0095), and was 22.9 mo for patients with a perfused liver dose of 150 Gy or higher, versus 10.3 mo for those with a perfused liver dose of less than 150 Gy (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23–0.75; P 5 0.0033). Lastly, median OS was not reached in patients who were secondarily resected (n 5 11, 10 in the PDA group and 1 in the SDA group), versus 10.8 mo in those without secondary resection (n 5 45) (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.065–0.43; P 5 0.0002). Only resected patients displayed favorable long-term OS rates, meaning an OS of more than 50% at 5 y. Conclusion: After longer follow-up, personalized dosimetry sustained a meaningful improvement in OS, which was dramatically improved for patients who were accurately downstaged toward resection, including most portal vein thrombosis patients.
KW - Y-loaded glass microspheres
KW - downstaged
KW - hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - personalized dosimetry
KW - portal vein thrombosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184285872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2967/jnumed.123.266211
DO - 10.2967/jnumed.123.266211
M3 - Article
C2 - 38212068
AN - SCOPUS:85184285872
SN - 0161-5505
VL - 65
SP - 264
EP - 269
JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
IS - 2
ER -