TY - JOUR
T1 - Magnetic resonance imaging before breast cancer surgery
T2 - results of an observational multicenter international prospective analysis (MIPA)
AU - Sardanelli, Francesco
AU - Trimboli, Rubina M.
AU - Houssami, Nehmat
AU - Gilbert, Fiona J.
AU - Helbich, Thomas H.
AU - Álvarez Benito, Marina
AU - Balleyguier, Corinne
AU - Bazzocchi, Massimo
AU - Bult, Peter
AU - Calabrese, Massimo
AU - Camps Herrero, Julia
AU - Cartia, Francesco
AU - Cassano, Enrico
AU - Clauser, Paola
AU - Cozzi, Andrea
AU - de Andrade, Danúbia A.
AU - de Lima Docema, Marcos F.
AU - Depretto, Catherine
AU - Dominelli, Valeria
AU - Forrai, Gábor
AU - Girometti, Rossano
AU - Harms, Steven E.
AU - Hilborne, Sarah
AU - Ienzi, Raffaele
AU - Lobbes, Marc B.I.
AU - Losio, Claudio
AU - Mann, Ritse M.
AU - Montemezzi, Stefania
AU - Obdeijn, Inge Marie
AU - Ozcan, Umit A.
AU - Pediconi, Federica
AU - Pinker, Katja
AU - Preibsch, Heike
AU - Raya Povedano, José L.
AU - Sacchetto, Daniela
AU - Scaperrotta, Gianfranco P.
AU - Schiaffino, Simone
AU - Schlooz, Margrethe
AU - Szabó, Botond K.
AU - Taylor, Donna B.
AU - Ulus, Özden S.
AU - Van Goethem, Mireille
AU - Veltman, Jeroen
AU - Weigel, Stefanie
AU - Wenkel, Evelyn
AU - Zuiani, Chiara
AU - Di Leo, Giovanni
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/3/1
Y1 - 2022/3/1
N2 - Objectives: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can inform surgical planning but might cause overtreatment by increasing the mastectomy rate. The Multicenter International Prospective Analysis (MIPA) study investigated this controversial issue. Methods: This observational study enrolled women aged 18–80 years with biopsy-proven breast cancer, who underwent MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammography and/or breast ultrasonography) or conventional imaging alone before surgery as routine practice at 27 centers. Exclusion criteria included planned neoadjuvant therapy, pregnancy, personal history of any cancer, and distant metastases. Results: Of 5896 analyzed patients, 2763 (46.9%) had conventional imaging only (noMRI group), and 3133 (53.1%) underwent MRI that was performed for diagnosis, screening, or unknown purposes in 692/3133 women (22.1%), with preoperative intent in 2441/3133 women (77.9%, MRI group). Patients in the MRI group were younger, had denser breasts, more cancers ≥ 20 mm, and a higher rate of invasive lobular histology than patients who underwent conventional imaging alone (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Mastectomy was planned based on conventional imaging in 22.4% (MRI group) versus 14.4% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). The additional planned mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 11.3%. The overall performed first- plus second-line mastectomy rate was 36.3% (MRI group) versus 18.0% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). In women receiving conserving surgery, MRI group had a significantly lower reoperation rate (8.5% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Clinicians requested breast MRI for women with a higher a priori probability of receiving mastectomy. MRI was associated with 11.3% more mastectomies, and with 3.2% fewer reoperations in the breast conservation subgroup. Key Points: • In 19% of patients of the MIPA study, breast MRI was performed for screening or diagnostic purposes. • The current patient selection to preoperative breast MRI implies an 11% increase in mastectomies, counterbalanced by a 3% reduction of the reoperation rate. • Data from the MIPA study can support discussion in tumor boards when preoperative MRI is under consideration and should be shared with patients to achieve informed decision-making.
AB - Objectives: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can inform surgical planning but might cause overtreatment by increasing the mastectomy rate. The Multicenter International Prospective Analysis (MIPA) study investigated this controversial issue. Methods: This observational study enrolled women aged 18–80 years with biopsy-proven breast cancer, who underwent MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammography and/or breast ultrasonography) or conventional imaging alone before surgery as routine practice at 27 centers. Exclusion criteria included planned neoadjuvant therapy, pregnancy, personal history of any cancer, and distant metastases. Results: Of 5896 analyzed patients, 2763 (46.9%) had conventional imaging only (noMRI group), and 3133 (53.1%) underwent MRI that was performed for diagnosis, screening, or unknown purposes in 692/3133 women (22.1%), with preoperative intent in 2441/3133 women (77.9%, MRI group). Patients in the MRI group were younger, had denser breasts, more cancers ≥ 20 mm, and a higher rate of invasive lobular histology than patients who underwent conventional imaging alone (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Mastectomy was planned based on conventional imaging in 22.4% (MRI group) versus 14.4% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). The additional planned mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 11.3%. The overall performed first- plus second-line mastectomy rate was 36.3% (MRI group) versus 18.0% (noMRI group) (p < 0.001). In women receiving conserving surgery, MRI group had a significantly lower reoperation rate (8.5% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Clinicians requested breast MRI for women with a higher a priori probability of receiving mastectomy. MRI was associated with 11.3% more mastectomies, and with 3.2% fewer reoperations in the breast conservation subgroup. Key Points: • In 19% of patients of the MIPA study, breast MRI was performed for screening or diagnostic purposes. • The current patient selection to preoperative breast MRI implies an 11% increase in mastectomies, counterbalanced by a 3% reduction of the reoperation rate. • Data from the MIPA study can support discussion in tumor boards when preoperative MRI is under consideration and should be shared with patients to achieve informed decision-making.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Breast-conserving surgery
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Mastectomy
KW - Reoperation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116962105&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-021-08240-x
DO - 10.1007/s00330-021-08240-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 34643778
AN - SCOPUS:85116962105
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 32
SP - 1611
EP - 1623
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 3
ER -