TY - JOUR
T1 - Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma
AU - Bisogno, Gianni
AU - Minard-Colin, Veronique
AU - Jenney, Meriel
AU - Ferrari, Andrea
AU - Chisholm, Julia
AU - Di Carlo, Daniela
AU - Hjalgrim, Lisa Lyngsie
AU - Orbach, Daniel
AU - Merks, Johannes Hendrikus Maria
AU - Casanova, Michela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - Maintenance chemotherapy (MC) defines the administration of prolonged relatively low-intensity chemotherapy with the aim of “maintaining” tumor complete remission. This paper aims to report an update of the RMS2005 trial, which demonstrated better survival for patients with high-risk localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) when MC with vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide was added to standard chemotherapy, and to discuss the published experience on MC in RMS. In the RMS2005 study, the outcome for patients receiving MC vs. those who stopped the treatment remains superior, with a 5-year disease-free survival of 78.1% vs. 70.1% (p = 0.056) and overall survival of 85.0% vs. 72.4% (p = 0.008), respectively. We found seven papers describing MC in RMS, but only one randomized trial that did not demonstrate any advantage when MC with eight courses of trofosfamide/idarubicine alternating with trofosfamide/etoposide has been employed in high-risk RMS. The use of MC showed better results in comparison to high-dose chemotherapy in non-randomized studies, including metastatic patients, and demonstrated feasibility and tolerability in relapsed RMS. Many aspects of MC in RMS need to be investigated, including the best drug combination and the optimal duration. The ongoing EpSSG trial will try to answer some of these questions.
AB - Maintenance chemotherapy (MC) defines the administration of prolonged relatively low-intensity chemotherapy with the aim of “maintaining” tumor complete remission. This paper aims to report an update of the RMS2005 trial, which demonstrated better survival for patients with high-risk localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) when MC with vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide was added to standard chemotherapy, and to discuss the published experience on MC in RMS. In the RMS2005 study, the outcome for patients receiving MC vs. those who stopped the treatment remains superior, with a 5-year disease-free survival of 78.1% vs. 70.1% (p = 0.056) and overall survival of 85.0% vs. 72.4% (p = 0.008), respectively. We found seven papers describing MC in RMS, but only one randomized trial that did not demonstrate any advantage when MC with eight courses of trofosfamide/idarubicine alternating with trofosfamide/etoposide has been employed in high-risk RMS. The use of MC showed better results in comparison to high-dose chemotherapy in non-randomized studies, including metastatic patients, and demonstrated feasibility and tolerability in relapsed RMS. Many aspects of MC in RMS need to be investigated, including the best drug combination and the optimal duration. The ongoing EpSSG trial will try to answer some of these questions.
KW - low-dose chemotherapy
KW - maintenance chemotherapy
KW - metronomic chemotherapy
KW - rhabdomyosarcoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85167803949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers15154012
DO - 10.3390/cancers15154012
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85167803949
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 15
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 15
M1 - 4012
ER -