Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC: first-generation or next-generation TKI?

Gonzalo Recondo, Francesco Facchinetti, Ken A. Olaussen, Benjamin Besse, Luc Friboulet

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticle 'review'Revue par des pairs

    278 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    The traditional approach to the treatment of patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harbouring ALK rearrangements or EGFR mutations has been the sequential administration of therapies (sequential treatment approach), in which patients first receive first-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which are eventually replaced by next-generation TKIs and/or chemotherapy upon disease progression, in a decision optionally guided by tumour molecular profiling. In the past few years, this strategy has been challenged by clinical evidence showing improved progression-free survival, improved intracranial disease control and a generally favourable toxicity profile when next-generation EGFR and ALK TKIs are used in the first-line setting. In this Review, we describe the existing preclinical and clinical evidence supporting both treatment strategies — the ‘historical’ sequential treatment strategy and the use of next-generation TKIs — as frontline therapies and discuss the suitability of both strategies for patients with EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)694-708
    Nombre de pages15
    journalNature Reviews Clinical Oncology
    Volume15
    Numéro de publication11
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 nov. 2018

    Contient cette citation