TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of Endometrial Cancer
T2 - French Society of Onco-Gynecology‘s Evaluation through a Delphi Survey
AU - on behalf of the SFOG and the SFOG Campus
AU - Marti, Carolin
AU - Deluche, Elise
AU - Jochum, Floriane
AU - Bendifallah, Sofiane
AU - Azais, Henri
AU - Deidier, Jonas
AU - Cockenpot, Vincent
AU - Menoux, Inès
AU - Balaya, Vincent
AU - Betrian, Sarah
AU - Chargari, Cyrus
AU - Gouy, Sébastien
AU - Genestie, Catherine
AU - Feki, Anis
AU - Uzan, Catherine
AU - Guyon, Frederic
AU - Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Mojgan
AU - Body, Noémie
AU - Akladios, Cherif
AU - Mathevet, Patrice
AU - Guani, Benedetta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Our aim was to assess the opinion of a panel of experts and obtain a consensus on the management of endometrial cancer in France and French Switzerland. A Delphi survey was carried out among a panel of French and French-speaking Swiss experts. The first questionnaire included 65 questions divided into eight categories: characterization of experts, histo-molecular characteristics and radiological data of endometrial cancer, and management of low-risk, intermediate-risk, intermediate–high-risk, high-risk, and metastatic cancers. The experts were asked to reply on a 9-point scale, both on the validity and the clarity of each question. After the answers were analyzed, a second questionnaire was sent to the same experts. The study took place between December 2021 and March 2022. Further, 58 (57.4%) of the 101 experts responded in the first round, and 39 recommendations were obtained (60%). Six questions were voted redundant and 20 discordant. These questions were reformulated, and, at the end of the second round, 17 recommendations were validated (85%). In total, the study presents an analysis of 56 questions and related responses. Expert advice helps to clarify non-consensual issues, standardize the management of endometrial cancer, and optimize clinical practices.
AB - Our aim was to assess the opinion of a panel of experts and obtain a consensus on the management of endometrial cancer in France and French Switzerland. A Delphi survey was carried out among a panel of French and French-speaking Swiss experts. The first questionnaire included 65 questions divided into eight categories: characterization of experts, histo-molecular characteristics and radiological data of endometrial cancer, and management of low-risk, intermediate-risk, intermediate–high-risk, high-risk, and metastatic cancers. The experts were asked to reply on a 9-point scale, both on the validity and the clarity of each question. After the answers were analyzed, a second questionnaire was sent to the same experts. The study took place between December 2021 and March 2022. Further, 58 (57.4%) of the 101 experts responded in the first round, and 39 recommendations were obtained (60%). Six questions were voted redundant and 20 discordant. These questions were reformulated, and, at the end of the second round, 17 recommendations were validated (85%). In total, the study presents an analysis of 56 questions and related responses. Expert advice helps to clarify non-consensual issues, standardize the management of endometrial cancer, and optimize clinical practices.
KW - Delphi procedure
KW - endometrial cancer
KW - endometrial cancer guidelines
KW - SFOG guidelines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142935503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm11226765
DO - 10.3390/jcm11226765
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142935503
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 11
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 22
M1 - 6765
ER -