TY - JOUR
T1 - Mitochondria in cancer
AU - Kroemer, G.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported in part by grants from Cancer Council Queensland and Czech Science Foundation P301/10/1937 to J. N. and from BIOCEV European Regional Development Fund CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109.
PY - 2006/8/7
Y1 - 2006/8/7
N2 - Prominent features of cancer cells include metabolic imbalances and enhanced resistance to mitochondrial apoptosis. The fact that tumors rely heavily on glycolysis to meet their metabolic demands has been recognized since the beginning of the twentieth century, yet a complete elucidation of the so-called Warburg effect has not been achieved. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this phenomenon, including the upregulation of rate-limiting steps of glycolysis, the accumulation of mutations in the mitochondrial genome, the hypoxia-induced switch from mitochondrial respiration to glycolysis or the metabolic reprogramming resulting from the loss-of-function of enzymes like fumarate and succinate dehydrogenases. How aerobic glycolysis and apoptosis resistance are linked remains to be elucidated. On the one hand, these alterations may be acquired independently by cancer cells during multistep oncogenesis. On the other hand, the suppression of the intrinsic apoptotic program may be achieved through mechanisms that directly lead to the Warburg phenotype. Cancer-specific mitochondrial alterations and bioenergetics may be taken advantage for the development of two novel classes of antineoplastic agents. A first approach would target glycolysis and/or revert the Warburg phenomenon, whereas a second approach would aim at inducing apoptosis by targeting mitochondrial proteins and membranes. In both instances, encouraging pre-clinical results have been obtained.
AB - Prominent features of cancer cells include metabolic imbalances and enhanced resistance to mitochondrial apoptosis. The fact that tumors rely heavily on glycolysis to meet their metabolic demands has been recognized since the beginning of the twentieth century, yet a complete elucidation of the so-called Warburg effect has not been achieved. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this phenomenon, including the upregulation of rate-limiting steps of glycolysis, the accumulation of mutations in the mitochondrial genome, the hypoxia-induced switch from mitochondrial respiration to glycolysis or the metabolic reprogramming resulting from the loss-of-function of enzymes like fumarate and succinate dehydrogenases. How aerobic glycolysis and apoptosis resistance are linked remains to be elucidated. On the one hand, these alterations may be acquired independently by cancer cells during multistep oncogenesis. On the other hand, the suppression of the intrinsic apoptotic program may be achieved through mechanisms that directly lead to the Warburg phenotype. Cancer-specific mitochondrial alterations and bioenergetics may be taken advantage for the development of two novel classes of antineoplastic agents. A first approach would target glycolysis and/or revert the Warburg phenomenon, whereas a second approach would aim at inducing apoptosis by targeting mitochondrial proteins and membranes. In both instances, encouraging pre-clinical results have been obtained.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746906633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.onc.1209589
DO - 10.1038/sj.onc.1209589
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16892077
AN - SCOPUS:33746906633
SN - 0950-9232
VL - 25
SP - 4630
EP - 4632
JO - Oncogene
JF - Oncogene
IS - 34
ER -