Multimodal treatment with doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide for the treatment of advanced or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: A unicentric experience

Julien Hadoux, Annie Rey, Pierre Duvillard, Catherine Lhommé, Corinne Balleyguier, Christine Haie-Meder, Philippe Morice, Youssef Tazi, Alexandra Leary, Christine Larue, Patricia Pautier

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Résumé

    Objective: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is a rare gynecologicmalignancy characterized by a poor prognosis due to a high rate of local and metastatic recurrences. Chemotherapy with doxorubicin or ifosfamide or both is associated with a 10% to 30% objective response rate. We report a monocentric experience with doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide (API) combination in the setting of multimodal treatment of advanced or metastatic ULMS. Patients and Methods: This monocentric retrospective study included patients with metastatic or locally advanced ULMS with a physiological age younger than 65 years treated in first line with a multimodal aggressive approach with API chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 d1, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 per day d1d2 plus mesna, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d3, plus G-CSF; every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles. Surgery, radiation therapy, or radiofrequency ablation therapy of metastatic sites was associated whenever possible. Results: Thirty-eight patients received API for metastatic or locally advanced ULMS. Median agewas 51 years (40-64 years); 4 (11%) patients were treated for a locally advanced disease and 34 (89%) for metastatic disease. Sixteen patients responded (4 complete responses+12 partial responses) among 33 evaluable patients (objective response rate, 48%); 8 and 9 patients had, respectively, stable and progressive disease. Twelve patients had surgeries with 9 surgical complete responses and 3 surgical partial responses. Median progression-free and overall survival in the whole population were 9.8 and 27 months, respectively. Main grade 3 Y 4 toxicities in 38 patients were neutropenia (74%), thrombocytopenia (60%), anemia (55%), fatigue (18%), and vomiting (13%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 37% of patients. Conclusions: Despite the toxicity observed, API is an effective treatment which compares favorably with other first-line therapies for patients with metastatic or advanced ULMS.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)296-302
    Nombre de pages7
    journalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
    Volume25
    Numéro de publication2
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 1 févr. 2015

    Contient cette citation