TY - JOUR
T1 - Natural History and Characteristics of ERBB2-mutated Hormone Receptor–positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
T2 - A Multi-institutional Retrospective Case–control Study from AACR Project GENIE
AU - on behalf of AACR Project GENIE Consortium
AU - LeNoue-Newton, Michele L.
AU - Chen, Sheau Chiann
AU - Stricker, Thomas
AU - Hyman, David M.
AU - Blauvelt, Natalie
AU - Bedard, Philippe L.
AU - Meric-Bernstam, Funda
AU - Punglia, Rinaa S.
AU - Schrag, Deborah
AU - Lepisto, Eva M.
AU - Andre, Fabrice
AU - Smyth, Lillian
AU - Dogan, Semih
AU - Yu, Celeste
AU - Wathoo, Chetna
AU - Levy, Mia
AU - Eli, Lisa D.
AU - Xu, Feng
AU - Mann, Grace
AU - Lalani, Alshad S.
AU - Ye, Fei
AU - Micheel, Christine M.
AU - Arnedos, Monica
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2022 American Association for Cancer Research
PY - 2022/5/15
Y1 - 2022/5/15
N2 - Purpose: We wanted to determine the prognosis and the phenotypic characteristics of hormone receptor–positive advanced breast cancer tumors harboring an ERBB2 mutation in the absence of a HER2 amplification. Experimental Design: We retrospectively collected information from the American Association of Cancer Research-Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange registry database from patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative, ERBB2-mutated advanced breast cancer. Phenotypic and co-mutational features, as well as response to treatment and outcome were compared with matched control cases ERBB2 wild type. Results: A total of 45 ERBB2-mutant cases were identified for 90 matched controls. The presence of an ERBB2 mutation was not associated with worse outcome determined by overall survival (OS) from first metastatic relapse. No significant differences were observed in phenotypic characteristics apart from higher lobular infiltrating subtype in the ERBB2-mutated group. ERBB2 mutation did not seem to have an impact in response to treatment or time-to-progression (TTP) to endocrine therapy compared with ERBB2 wild type. In the co-mutational analyses, CDH1 mutation was more frequent in the ERBB2-mutated group (FDR < 1). Although not significant, fewer co-occurring ESR1 mutations and more KRAS mutations were identified in the ERBB2-mutated group. Conclusions: ERBB2-activating mutation was not associated with a worse OS from time of first metastatic relapse, or differences in TTP on treatment as compared with a series of matched controls. Although not significant, differences in coexisting mutations (CDH1, ESR1, and KRAS) were noted between the ERBB2-mutated and the control group.
AB - Purpose: We wanted to determine the prognosis and the phenotypic characteristics of hormone receptor–positive advanced breast cancer tumors harboring an ERBB2 mutation in the absence of a HER2 amplification. Experimental Design: We retrospectively collected information from the American Association of Cancer Research-Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange registry database from patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative, ERBB2-mutated advanced breast cancer. Phenotypic and co-mutational features, as well as response to treatment and outcome were compared with matched control cases ERBB2 wild type. Results: A total of 45 ERBB2-mutant cases were identified for 90 matched controls. The presence of an ERBB2 mutation was not associated with worse outcome determined by overall survival (OS) from first metastatic relapse. No significant differences were observed in phenotypic characteristics apart from higher lobular infiltrating subtype in the ERBB2-mutated group. ERBB2 mutation did not seem to have an impact in response to treatment or time-to-progression (TTP) to endocrine therapy compared with ERBB2 wild type. In the co-mutational analyses, CDH1 mutation was more frequent in the ERBB2-mutated group (FDR < 1). Although not significant, fewer co-occurring ESR1 mutations and more KRAS mutations were identified in the ERBB2-mutated group. Conclusions: ERBB2-activating mutation was not associated with a worse OS from time of first metastatic relapse, or differences in TTP on treatment as compared with a series of matched controls. Although not significant, differences in coexisting mutations (CDH1, ESR1, and KRAS) were noted between the ERBB2-mutated and the control group.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130635114&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0885
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0885
M3 - Article
C2 - 35190802
AN - SCOPUS:85130635114
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 28
SP - 2118
EP - 2130
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 10
ER -