TY - JOUR
T1 - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) increases immune infiltration and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)
AU - Mesnage, S. J.L.
AU - Auguste, A.
AU - Genestie, C.
AU - Dunant, A.
AU - Pain, E.
AU - Drusch, F.
AU - Gouy, S.
AU - Morice, P.
AU - Bentivegna, E.
AU - Lhomme, C.
AU - Pautier, P.
AU - Michels, J.
AU - Le Formal, A.
AU - Cheaib, B.
AU - Adam, J.
AU - Leary, Alexandra F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2016.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Background: Lymphocytic infiltration at diagnosis is prognostic in EOC, however, the impact of NACT on tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or PD-L1 expression remains poorly described. Patients and methods: Patients with EOC and sequential samples (pre-NACT, post-NACT or relapse) were retrospectively identified. TILs were evaluated on whole sections; stromal TILs (sTILs) scored as percentage of stromal area with high sTILs defined as ≥50%; intra-epithelial TILs (ieTILs) scored semi-quantitatively (0-3) with high ieTILs ≥2. A smaller number were available for PD-L1 evaluation, cut-off for positivity was ≥5% staining. Results: sTILs were detected in all tumours at diagnosis (range 2-90%, median 20%), with 22% (25/113) showing high sTILs. Among evaluable paired pre/post-NACT samples (N=83), an overall increase in median sTILs from 20% to 30% was seen following NACT (P=0.0005); individually the impact of NACT varied with sTILs increasing in 51% (42/83), decreasing in 25%, and stable in 24%. Post-NACT sTILs were predictive of platinum-free interval (PFI), patients with PFI ≥6 months had significantly higher post-NACT sTILs (sTILs 28% versus 18% for PFI < 6 months, P=0.026); pre-NACT sTILS were not predictive. At diagnosis, 23% showed high ieTILs, and following NACT 33% showed increasing ieTILs. Proportion of tumours with PD-L1-positive immune cells was 30% (15/50) pre-NACT and 53% (27/51) post-NACT (P=0.026). Among paired tumours, 63% of PD-L1-negative tumours became positive after NACT, furthermore cisplatin induced PD-L1 expression in PD-L1- negative EOC cell lines. On multivariate analysis, high sTILs both pre- and post-NACT were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.49, P=0.02 and HR 0.60, P =0.05, respectively). No prognostic impact of ieTILs or PD-L1 expression was detected. Conclusions: In EOC, sTILs levels are prognostic at diagnosis and remain prognostic after NACT. TILs and PD-L1 expression increase following NACT. Evaluation of immune parameters in the post-NACT tumour may help select patients for immunotherapy trials.
AB - Background: Lymphocytic infiltration at diagnosis is prognostic in EOC, however, the impact of NACT on tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) or PD-L1 expression remains poorly described. Patients and methods: Patients with EOC and sequential samples (pre-NACT, post-NACT or relapse) were retrospectively identified. TILs were evaluated on whole sections; stromal TILs (sTILs) scored as percentage of stromal area with high sTILs defined as ≥50%; intra-epithelial TILs (ieTILs) scored semi-quantitatively (0-3) with high ieTILs ≥2. A smaller number were available for PD-L1 evaluation, cut-off for positivity was ≥5% staining. Results: sTILs were detected in all tumours at diagnosis (range 2-90%, median 20%), with 22% (25/113) showing high sTILs. Among evaluable paired pre/post-NACT samples (N=83), an overall increase in median sTILs from 20% to 30% was seen following NACT (P=0.0005); individually the impact of NACT varied with sTILs increasing in 51% (42/83), decreasing in 25%, and stable in 24%. Post-NACT sTILs were predictive of platinum-free interval (PFI), patients with PFI ≥6 months had significantly higher post-NACT sTILs (sTILs 28% versus 18% for PFI < 6 months, P=0.026); pre-NACT sTILS were not predictive. At diagnosis, 23% showed high ieTILs, and following NACT 33% showed increasing ieTILs. Proportion of tumours with PD-L1-positive immune cells was 30% (15/50) pre-NACT and 53% (27/51) post-NACT (P=0.026). Among paired tumours, 63% of PD-L1-negative tumours became positive after NACT, furthermore cisplatin induced PD-L1 expression in PD-L1- negative EOC cell lines. On multivariate analysis, high sTILs both pre- and post-NACT were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.49, P=0.02 and HR 0.60, P =0.05, respectively). No prognostic impact of ieTILs or PD-L1 expression was detected. Conclusions: In EOC, sTILs levels are prognostic at diagnosis and remain prognostic after NACT. TILs and PD-L1 expression increase following NACT. Evaluation of immune parameters in the post-NACT tumour may help select patients for immunotherapy trials.
KW - Epithelial ovarian cancer
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - PD-L1
KW - Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018363790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/annonc/mdw625
DO - 10.1093/annonc/mdw625
M3 - Article
C2 - 27864219
AN - SCOPUS:85018363790
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 28
SP - 651
EP - 657
JO - Annals of Oncology
JF - Annals of Oncology
IS - 3
ER -