TY - JOUR
T1 - Ninety percent of the adverse outcomes occur in 10% of patients
T2 - can we identify the populations at high risk of developing peritoneal metastases after curative surgery for colorectal cancer?
AU - Honoré, Charles
AU - Gelli, Maximiliano
AU - Francoual, Julie
AU - Benhaim, Léonor
AU - Elias, Dominique
AU - Goéré, Diane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/7/4
Y1 - 2017/7/4
N2 - Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) occur in 3.4–6.3% after curative surgery for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Systematic “2nd look” surgery helps overcoming the diagnostic problem but can be only proposed to selected patients. The aim of this study was to update the knowledge on risk factors of developing PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods: A systematic review of the literature published between 2011 and 2016 was made, searching for all clinical studies reporting the incidence of recurrent PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer and factors associated with the primary tumour that were likely to influence this recurrence rate. Results: Seven new clinical studies were considered informative for risk factors and added to the 16 reviewed in 2013. Even if the level of evidence was low, data suggested rates of recurrent PM at 1 year between 54% and 71% after completely resected synchronous PM, between 62% and 71% after resection of isolated synchronous ovarian metastases, of 27% after surgery for a perforated primary tumour, of 16% after surgery for a pT4 tumour, and between 11% and 36% after surgery for a mucinous histological subtype. No new risk factor was identified. Conclusions: Evidence regarding the incidence of recurrent PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is poor. Situations at higher risk of recurrent PM are synchronous PM, synchronous isolated ovarian metastases, perforated primary tumour with serosa invasion and mucinous histological subtype.
AB - Background: Peritoneal metastases (PM) occur in 3.4–6.3% after curative surgery for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Systematic “2nd look” surgery helps overcoming the diagnostic problem but can be only proposed to selected patients. The aim of this study was to update the knowledge on risk factors of developing PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods: A systematic review of the literature published between 2011 and 2016 was made, searching for all clinical studies reporting the incidence of recurrent PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer and factors associated with the primary tumour that were likely to influence this recurrence rate. Results: Seven new clinical studies were considered informative for risk factors and added to the 16 reviewed in 2013. Even if the level of evidence was low, data suggested rates of recurrent PM at 1 year between 54% and 71% after completely resected synchronous PM, between 62% and 71% after resection of isolated synchronous ovarian metastases, of 27% after surgery for a perforated primary tumour, of 16% after surgery for a pT4 tumour, and between 11% and 36% after surgery for a mucinous histological subtype. No new risk factor was identified. Conclusions: Evidence regarding the incidence of recurrent PM after curative surgery for colorectal cancer is poor. Situations at higher risk of recurrent PM are synchronous PM, synchronous isolated ovarian metastases, perforated primary tumour with serosa invasion and mucinous histological subtype.
KW - HIPEC
KW - Risk factors
KW - colorectal cancer
KW - peritoneal metastases
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021685801&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02656736.2017.1306119
DO - 10.1080/02656736.2017.1306119
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28540831
AN - SCOPUS:85021685801
SN - 0265-6736
VL - 33
SP - 505
EP - 510
JO - International Journal of Hyperthermia
JF - International Journal of Hyperthermia
IS - 5
ER -