TY - JOUR
T1 - Obinutuzumab Pretreatment as a Novel Approach to Mitigate Formation of Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Cergutuzumab Amunaleukin in Patients with Solid Tumors
AU - Peters, Solange
AU - Angevin, Eric
AU - Alonso-Gordoa, Teresa
AU - Rohrberg, Kristoffer
AU - Melero, Ignacio
AU - Mellado, Begoña
AU - Perez-Gracia, Jose Luis
AU - Tabernero, Josep
AU - Adessi, Celine
AU - Boetsch, Christophe
AU - Watson, Carl
AU - Porto, Joseph Dal
AU - Dejardin, David
AU - Nagro, Christopher Del
AU - Nicolini, Valeria
AU - Evers, Stefan
AU - Klein, Christian
AU - Leutgeb, Barbara
AU - Pisa, Pavel
AU - Rossmann, Eva
AU - Saro, Jose
AU - Umana, Pablo
AU - Charo, Jehad
AU - Teichgraber, Volker
AU - Steeghs, Neeltje
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2024/4/15
Y1 - 2024/4/15
N2 - Purpose: The immunocytokine cergutuzumab amunaleukin (CEA-IL2v) showed manageable safety and favorable pharmacodynamics in phase I/Ib trials in patients with advanced/metastatic carcinoembryonic antigen-positive (CEAþ) solid tumors, but this was accompanied by a high incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). We examined B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab as a potential mitigation strategy. Experimental Design: Preclinical data comparing B-cell depletion with rituximab versus obinutuzumab are summarized. Substudies of phase I/Ib trials investigated the effect of obinutuzumab pretreatment on ADA development, safety, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of CEA-IL2v atezolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic or unresectable CEAþ solid tumors who had progressed on standard of care. Results: Preclinical data showed superior B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab versus rituximab. In clinical studies, patients received CEA-IL2v monotherapy with (n ¼ 16) or without (n ¼ 6) obinutuzumab pretreatment (monotherapy study), or CEA-IL2v þ atezolizumab þ obinutuzumab pretreatment (n ¼ 5; combination study). In the monotherapy study, after four cycles (every 2 weeks treatment), 0/15 evaluable patients administered obinutuzumab pretreatment had ADAs versus 4/6 patients without obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab pretreatment with CEA-IL2v monotherapy showed no new safety signals and pharmacodynamic data suggested minimal impact on T cells and natural killer cells. Conversely, increased liver toxicity was observed in the combination study (CEA-IL2v þ atezolizumab þ obinutuzumab pretreatment). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that obinutuzumab pretreatment before CEA-IL2v administration in patients with CEAþ solid tumors may be a feasible and potent ADA mitigation strategy, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting broader investigation of obinutuzumab pretreatment for ADA mitigation in other settings.
AB - Purpose: The immunocytokine cergutuzumab amunaleukin (CEA-IL2v) showed manageable safety and favorable pharmacodynamics in phase I/Ib trials in patients with advanced/metastatic carcinoembryonic antigen-positive (CEAþ) solid tumors, but this was accompanied by a high incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). We examined B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab as a potential mitigation strategy. Experimental Design: Preclinical data comparing B-cell depletion with rituximab versus obinutuzumab are summarized. Substudies of phase I/Ib trials investigated the effect of obinutuzumab pretreatment on ADA development, safety, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of CEA-IL2v atezolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic or unresectable CEAþ solid tumors who had progressed on standard of care. Results: Preclinical data showed superior B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab versus rituximab. In clinical studies, patients received CEA-IL2v monotherapy with (n ¼ 16) or without (n ¼ 6) obinutuzumab pretreatment (monotherapy study), or CEA-IL2v þ atezolizumab þ obinutuzumab pretreatment (n ¼ 5; combination study). In the monotherapy study, after four cycles (every 2 weeks treatment), 0/15 evaluable patients administered obinutuzumab pretreatment had ADAs versus 4/6 patients without obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab pretreatment with CEA-IL2v monotherapy showed no new safety signals and pharmacodynamic data suggested minimal impact on T cells and natural killer cells. Conversely, increased liver toxicity was observed in the combination study (CEA-IL2v þ atezolizumab þ obinutuzumab pretreatment). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that obinutuzumab pretreatment before CEA-IL2v administration in patients with CEAþ solid tumors may be a feasible and potent ADA mitigation strategy, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting broader investigation of obinutuzumab pretreatment for ADA mitigation in other settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190450025&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2658
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-2658
M3 - Article
C2 - 38319672
AN - SCOPUS:85190450025
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 30
SP - 1630
EP - 1641
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 8
ER -