Obinutuzumab Pretreatment as a Novel Approach to Mitigate Formation of Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Cergutuzumab Amunaleukin in Patients with Solid Tumors

Solange Peters, Eric Angevin, Teresa Alonso-Gordoa, Kristoffer Rohrberg, Ignacio Melero, Begoña Mellado, Jose Luis Perez-Gracia, Josep Tabernero, Celine Adessi, Christophe Boetsch, Carl Watson, Joseph Dal Porto, David Dejardin, Christopher Del Nagro, Valeria Nicolini, Stefan Evers, Christian Klein, Barbara Leutgeb, Pavel Pisa, Eva RossmannJose Saro, Pablo Umana, Jehad Charo, Volker Teichgraber, Neeltje Steeghs

    Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

    Résumé

    Purpose: The immunocytokine cergutuzumab amunaleukin (CEA-IL2v) showed manageable safety and favorable pharmacodynamics in phase I/Ib trials in patients with advanced/metastatic carcinoembryonic antigen-positive (CEAþ) solid tumors, but this was accompanied by a high incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). We examined B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab as a potential mitigation strategy. Experimental Design: Preclinical data comparing B-cell depletion with rituximab versus obinutuzumab are summarized. Substudies of phase I/Ib trials investigated the effect of obinutuzumab pretreatment on ADA development, safety, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of CEA-IL2v atezolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic or unresectable CEAþ solid tumors who had progressed on standard of care. Results: Preclinical data showed superior B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab versus rituximab. In clinical studies, patients received CEA-IL2v monotherapy with (n ¼ 16) or without (n ¼ 6) obinutuzumab pretreatment (monotherapy study), or CEA-IL2v þ atezolizumab þ obinutuzumab pretreatment (n ¼ 5; combination study). In the monotherapy study, after four cycles (every 2 weeks treatment), 0/15 evaluable patients administered obinutuzumab pretreatment had ADAs versus 4/6 patients without obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab pretreatment with CEA-IL2v monotherapy showed no new safety signals and pharmacodynamic data suggested minimal impact on T cells and natural killer cells. Conversely, increased liver toxicity was observed in the combination study (CEA-IL2v þ atezolizumab þ obinutuzumab pretreatment). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that obinutuzumab pretreatment before CEA-IL2v administration in patients with CEAþ solid tumors may be a feasible and potent ADA mitigation strategy, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting broader investigation of obinutuzumab pretreatment for ADA mitigation in other settings.

    langue originaleAnglais
    Pages (de - à)1630-1641
    Nombre de pages12
    journalClinical Cancer Research
    Volume30
    Numéro de publication8
    Les DOIs
    étatPublié - 15 avr. 2024

    Contient cette citation