TY - JOUR
T1 - Opinions and use of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer
T2 - International survey and case-vignette study
AU - Heinrich, Stefan
AU - Besselink, Marc
AU - Moehler, Markus
AU - Van Laethem, Jean Luc
AU - Ducreux, Michel
AU - Grimminger, Peter
AU - Mittler, Jens
AU - Lang, Hauke
AU - Lutz, Manfred P.
AU - Lesurtel, Mickael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/7/9
Y1 - 2019/7/9
N2 - Background: Several new treatment options have become available for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but the support for their use for resectable, borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC is unclear. Methods: A survey was distributed to the members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and the pancreas group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) regarding 1) definitions of local resectability, 2) indications for neoadjuvant therapy and 3) case-vignettes regarding the resectability and treatment of PDAC. Results: In total, 114 participants from 37 countries were registered. About 35% of respondents, each, were of the opinion that borderline resectability is defined by any venous tumor contact and venous involvement < 180° or > 180°, respectively. The majority (75.4%) of participants believed that borderline resectable PDAC has a high risk for R1 resection and that neoadjuvant therapy might increase the R0-resection rate (79.8%) and improve oncological patient selection (84.2%). Chemotherapy was regarded useful to convert locally advanced to resectable PDAC by 55.7% of respondents. In the cases with resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced PDAC, 10 (8.8%), 78 (68.4%), 55 (48.2%) of participants would start with chemotherapy, respectively. Conclusions: Although definitions for borderline resectability differ among European surgeons, there seems to be a rather strong support for preoperative chemotherapy in PDAC aiming at minimizing R1 resections while increasing resection rates.
AB - Background: Several new treatment options have become available for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but the support for their use for resectable, borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC is unclear. Methods: A survey was distributed to the members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and the pancreas group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) regarding 1) definitions of local resectability, 2) indications for neoadjuvant therapy and 3) case-vignettes regarding the resectability and treatment of PDAC. Results: In total, 114 participants from 37 countries were registered. About 35% of respondents, each, were of the opinion that borderline resectability is defined by any venous tumor contact and venous involvement < 180° or > 180°, respectively. The majority (75.4%) of participants believed that borderline resectable PDAC has a high risk for R1 resection and that neoadjuvant therapy might increase the R0-resection rate (79.8%) and improve oncological patient selection (84.2%). Chemotherapy was regarded useful to convert locally advanced to resectable PDAC by 55.7% of respondents. In the cases with resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced PDAC, 10 (8.8%), 78 (68.4%), 55 (48.2%) of participants would start with chemotherapy, respectively. Conclusions: Although definitions for borderline resectability differ among European surgeons, there seems to be a rather strong support for preoperative chemotherapy in PDAC aiming at minimizing R1 resections while increasing resection rates.
KW - Defintions
KW - Neoadjuvant therapy
KW - PDAC
KW - Pancreatic cancer
KW - Resectability
KW - Survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068819247&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12885-019-5889-5
DO - 10.1186/s12885-019-5889-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 31288786
AN - SCOPUS:85068819247
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 19
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 675
ER -