TY - JOUR
T1 - Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk
T2 - Retrospective and prospective analyses from a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carrier cohort study
AU - EMBRACE, GENEPSO, BCFR, HEBON, kConFab, and IBCCS
AU - Schrijver, Lieske H.
AU - Olsson, Håkan
AU - Phillips, Kelly Anne
AU - Terry, Mary Beth
AU - Goldgar, David E.
AU - Kast, Karin
AU - Engel, Christoph
AU - Mooij, Thea M.
AU - Adlard, Julian
AU - Barrowdale, Daniel
AU - Davidson, Rosemarie
AU - Eeles, Ros
AU - Ellis, Steve
AU - Evans, D. Gareth
AU - Frost, Debra
AU - Izatt, Louise
AU - Porteous, Mary E.
AU - Side, Lucy E.
AU - Walker, Lisa
AU - Berthet, Pascaline
AU - Bonadona, Valérie
AU - Leroux, Dominique
AU - Mouret-Fourme, Emmanuelle
AU - Venat-Bouvet, Laurence
AU - Buys, Saundra S.
AU - Southey, Melissa C.
AU - John, Esther M.
AU - Chung, Wendy K.
AU - Daly, Mary B.
AU - Bane, Anita
AU - van Asperen, Christi J.
AU - Garcia, Encarna B.Gómez
AU - Mourits, Marian J.E.
AU - Roos-Blom, Marie José
AU - Friedlander, Michael L.
AU - McLachlan, Sue Anne
AU - Singer, Christian F.
AU - Foretova, Lenka
AU - Gerdes, Anne Marie
AU - Caldes, Trinidad
AU - Olah, Edith
AU - Jakubowska, Anna
AU - Noguès, Catherine
AU - Andrieu, Nadine
AU - Easton, Douglas F.
AU - van Leeuwen, Flora E.
AU - Hopper, John L.
AU - Milne, Roger L.
AU - Antoniou, Antonis C.
AU - Caron, Olivier
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Background: For BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, the association between oral contraceptive preparation (OCP) use and breast cancer (BC) risk is still unclear. Methods: Breast camcer risk associations were estimated from OCP data on 6030 BRCA1 and 3809 BRCA2 mutation carriers using age-dependent Cox regression, stratified by study and birth cohort. Prospective, left-truncated retrospective and fullcohort retrospective analyses were performed. Results: For BRCA1 mutation carriers, OCP use was not associated with BC risk in prospective analyses (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 1.56), but in the left-truncated and full-cohort retrospective analyses, risks were increased by 26% (95% CI = 6% to 51%) and 39% (95% CI = 23% to 58%), respectively. For BRCA2mutation carriers, OCP use was associated with BC risk in prospective analyses (HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.97), but retrospective analyses were inconsistent (left-truncated: HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.33; full cohort: HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.81). There was evidence of increasing risk with duration of use, especially before the first full-termpregnancy (BRCA1: both retrospective analyses, P < .001 and P = .001, respectively; BRCA2: full retrospective analysis, P = .002). Conclusions: Prospective analyses did not show that past use of OCP is associated with an increased BC risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers in young middle-aged women (40-50 years). For BRCA2 mutation carriers, a causal association is also not likely at those ages. Findings between retrospective and prospective analyses were inconsistent and could be due to survival bias or a true association for younger women who were underrepresented in the prospective cohort. Given the uncertain safety of long-termOCP use for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, indications other than contraception should be avoided and nonhormonal contraceptive methods should be discussed.
AB - Background: For BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, the association between oral contraceptive preparation (OCP) use and breast cancer (BC) risk is still unclear. Methods: Breast camcer risk associations were estimated from OCP data on 6030 BRCA1 and 3809 BRCA2 mutation carriers using age-dependent Cox regression, stratified by study and birth cohort. Prospective, left-truncated retrospective and fullcohort retrospective analyses were performed. Results: For BRCA1 mutation carriers, OCP use was not associated with BC risk in prospective analyses (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.75 to 1.56), but in the left-truncated and full-cohort retrospective analyses, risks were increased by 26% (95% CI = 6% to 51%) and 39% (95% CI = 23% to 58%), respectively. For BRCA2mutation carriers, OCP use was associated with BC risk in prospective analyses (HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.97), but retrospective analyses were inconsistent (left-truncated: HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.33; full cohort: HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.81). There was evidence of increasing risk with duration of use, especially before the first full-termpregnancy (BRCA1: both retrospective analyses, P < .001 and P = .001, respectively; BRCA2: full retrospective analysis, P = .002). Conclusions: Prospective analyses did not show that past use of OCP is associated with an increased BC risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers in young middle-aged women (40-50 years). For BRCA2 mutation carriers, a causal association is also not likely at those ages. Findings between retrospective and prospective analyses were inconsistent and could be due to survival bias or a true association for younger women who were underrepresented in the prospective cohort. Given the uncertain safety of long-termOCP use for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, indications other than contraception should be avoided and nonhormonal contraceptive methods should be discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071374291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jncics/pky023
DO - 10.1093/jncics/pky023
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071374291
SN - 2515-5091
VL - 2
JO - JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JF - JNCI Cancer Spectrum
IS - 2
M1 - pky023
ER -