TY - JOUR
T1 - Overall survival in patients with re-excision of positive microscopic margins of limb and trunk wall soft tissue sarcoma operated outside of a reference center
T2 - a nationwide cohort analysis
AU - on behalf of the NETSARC/RREPS and French Sarcoma Group-Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs Osseuses (GSF-GETO) networks
AU - Gouin, Francois
AU - Stoeckle, Eberhard
AU - Honoré, Charles
AU - Ropars, Mickael
AU - Jafari, Mehrdad
AU - Mattei, Jean Camille
AU - Rochwerger, Alexandre
AU - Carrere, Sébastien
AU - Waast, Denis
AU - Ferron, Gwenaël
AU - Machiavello, Jean Christophe
AU - Anract, Philippe
AU - Marchal, Frédéric
AU - Sirveaux, François
AU - Marco, Oren
AU - Guiramand, Jérôme
AU - Paquette, Brice
AU - Di Marco, Antonio
AU - Causeret, Sylvain
AU - Guilloit, Jean Marc
AU - Soibinet, Pauline
AU - Tzanis, Dimitri
AU - Gimbergues, Pierre
AU - Fiorenza, Fabrice
AU - Dujardin, Franck
AU - Le Nail, Louis R.
AU - Ruzic, Jean Christophe
AU - Chemin-Airiau, Claire
AU - Morelle, Magali
AU - Meeus, Pierre
AU - Karanian, Marie
AU - Le Loarer, François
AU - Vaz, Gualter
AU - Blay, Jean Yves
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - Background: This French nationwide NETSARC exhaustive prospective cohort aims to explore the impact of systematic re-excision (RE) as adjuvant care on overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and local and distant control (RFS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with positive microscopic margins (R1) after initial resection performed outside of a reference center. Methods: Eligible patients had experienced STS surgery outside a reference center from 2010 to 2017, and had R1 margins after initial surgery. Characteristics and treatment comparisons used chi-square for categorical variables and Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous data. Survival distributions were compared in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 1,284 patients had experienced initial STS surgery outside NETSARC with R1 margins, including 1,029 patients with second operation documented. Among the latter, 698 patients experienced re-excision, and 331 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, tumor size, tumor depth, and histotype in the population of patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for OS (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.23–0.56, p<0.0001), for LRFS (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.36–0.56, p<0.0001), and for RFS (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.26–0.46, p<0.0001). Conclusion: This large nationwide series shows that RE improved overall survival in patients with STS of extremities and trunk wall, with prior R1 resection performed outside of a reference center. RE as part of adjuvant care should be systematically considered. Level of evidence II.
AB - Background: This French nationwide NETSARC exhaustive prospective cohort aims to explore the impact of systematic re-excision (RE) as adjuvant care on overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), and local and distant control (RFS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with positive microscopic margins (R1) after initial resection performed outside of a reference center. Methods: Eligible patients had experienced STS surgery outside a reference center from 2010 to 2017, and had R1 margins after initial surgery. Characteristics and treatment comparisons used chi-square for categorical variables and Kruskall-Wallis test for continuous data. Survival distributions were compared in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) using a log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 1,284 patients had experienced initial STS surgery outside NETSARC with R1 margins, including 1,029 patients with second operation documented. Among the latter, 698 patients experienced re-excision, and 331 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, tumor size, tumor depth, and histotype in the population of patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for OS (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.23–0.56, p<0.0001), for LRFS (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.36–0.56, p<0.0001), and for RFS (HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.26–0.46, p<0.0001). Conclusion: This large nationwide series shows that RE improved overall survival in patients with STS of extremities and trunk wall, with prior R1 resection performed outside of a reference center. RE as part of adjuvant care should be systematically considered. Level of evidence II.
KW - Multidisciplinary tumor board resection margins
KW - Reference center
KW - Relapse
KW - Soft tissue sarcoma
KW - Surgery
KW - Survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139100194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12885-022-10121-5
DO - 10.1186/s12885-022-10121-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 36192725
AN - SCOPUS:85139100194
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 22
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 1034
ER -