TY - JOUR
T1 - Paclitaxel given once per week with or without bevacizumab in patients with advanced angiosarcoma
T2 - A randomized phase II trial
AU - Ray-Coquard, Isabelle L.
AU - Domont, Julien
AU - Tresch-Bruneel, Emmanuelle
AU - Bompas, Emmanuelle
AU - Cassier, Philippe A.
AU - Mir, Olivier
AU - Piperno-Neumann, Sophie
AU - Italiano, Antoine
AU - Chevreau, Christine
AU - Cupissol, Didier
AU - Bertucci, Francois
AU - Bay, Jacques Olivier
AU - Collard, Olivier
AU - Saada-Bouzid, Esma
AU - Isambert, Nicolas
AU - Delcambre, Corinne
AU - Clisant, Stéphanie
AU - Cesne, Axel Le
AU - Blay, Jean Yves
AU - Penel, Nicolas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Chemical Society of Japan.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Purpose The aim of this randomized, phase II trial was to explore the activity and safety of adding bevacizumab to paclitaxel once per week in treatment of angiosarcomas (AS). Methods Patients were treated with paclitaxel alone (90 mg/m2 per week for six cycles of 28 days each; arm A) or with paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks; arm B). In the combination treatment arm, bevacizumab was administered after the six cycles of chemotherapy as maintenance therapy (15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) until intolerance or progression occurred. Stratification factors were superficial versus visceral AS and de novo versus radiation-induced AS. The primary end point was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, which was based on RECIST, version 1.1. Statistical assumptions were P0 = 20%, P1 = 40%, a = 10%, and b = 20%. P0 was the PFS rate at 6 months defining inactive drug, and P1 was the PFS rate at 6 months defining promising drug. Results A total of 52 patients were enrolled, and 50 were randomly assigned in 14 centers. The most common primary sites were the breast (49%) and skin (12%). There were 17 (34%) visceral and 24 (49%) radiation-induced AS. The performance status was 0 in 24 patients (49%) and 1 in the remaining 25 patients (51%). The median follow-up time was 14.5 months. Both treatment regimens were considered active, with 6-month PFS rates of 54% (14 of 26) in arm A and 57% (14 of 24) in arm B. The median overall survival rates were 19.5 months in arm A and 15.9 months in arm B. Toxicity was higher with the combination arm and included one fatal drug-related toxicity (intestinal occlusion). Conclusion The primary objective was met in both treatment arms. However, the present data do not support additional clinical investigation of combined paclitaxel/bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced AS.
AB - Purpose The aim of this randomized, phase II trial was to explore the activity and safety of adding bevacizumab to paclitaxel once per week in treatment of angiosarcomas (AS). Methods Patients were treated with paclitaxel alone (90 mg/m2 per week for six cycles of 28 days each; arm A) or with paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks; arm B). In the combination treatment arm, bevacizumab was administered after the six cycles of chemotherapy as maintenance therapy (15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) until intolerance or progression occurred. Stratification factors were superficial versus visceral AS and de novo versus radiation-induced AS. The primary end point was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, which was based on RECIST, version 1.1. Statistical assumptions were P0 = 20%, P1 = 40%, a = 10%, and b = 20%. P0 was the PFS rate at 6 months defining inactive drug, and P1 was the PFS rate at 6 months defining promising drug. Results A total of 52 patients were enrolled, and 50 were randomly assigned in 14 centers. The most common primary sites were the breast (49%) and skin (12%). There were 17 (34%) visceral and 24 (49%) radiation-induced AS. The performance status was 0 in 24 patients (49%) and 1 in the remaining 25 patients (51%). The median follow-up time was 14.5 months. Both treatment regimens were considered active, with 6-month PFS rates of 54% (14 of 26) in arm A and 57% (14 of 24) in arm B. The median overall survival rates were 19.5 months in arm A and 15.9 months in arm B. Toxicity was higher with the combination arm and included one fatal drug-related toxicity (intestinal occlusion). Conclusion The primary objective was met in both treatment arms. However, the present data do not support additional clinical investigation of combined paclitaxel/bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced AS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941268634&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8505
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8505
M3 - Article
C2 - 26215950
AN - SCOPUS:84941268634
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 33
SP - 2797
EP - 2802
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 25
ER -