Palliative care delivery according to age in 12,000 women with metastatic breast cancer: Analysis in the multicentre ESME-MBC cohort 2008–2016

Matthieu Frasca, Camille Sabathe, Suzette Delaloge, Angeline Galvin, Anne Patsouris, Christelle Levy, Marie A. Mouret-Reynier, Isabelle Desmoulins, Laurence Vanlemmens, Thomas Bachelot, Anthony Goncalves, Virginie Perotin, Lionel Uwer, Jean S. Frenel, Jean M. Ferrero, Carole Bouleuc, Jean C. Eymard, Véronique Dieras, Marianne Leheurteur, Thierry PetitFlorence Dalenc, Anne Jaffre, Michaël Chevrot, Coralie Courtinard, Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

6 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Introduction: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) often require inpatient palliative care (IPC). However, mounting evidence suggests age-related disparities in palliative care delivery. This study aimed to assess the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of IPC delivery, as well as the influence of age. Methods: The national ESME (Epidemio-Strategy-Medical-Economical)-MBC cohort includes consecutive MBC patients treated in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Centres. ICD-10 palliative care coding was used for IPC identification. Results: Our analysis included 12,375 patients, 5093 (41.2%) of whom were aged 65 or over. The median follow-up was 41.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5–42.5). The CIF of IPC was 10.3% (95% CI, 10.2–10.4) and 24.8% (95% CI, 24.7–24.8) at 2 and 8 years, respectively. At 2 years, among triple-negative patients, young patients (<65 yo) had a higher CIF of IPC than older patients after adjusting for cancer characteristics, centre and period (65+/<65: β = −0.05; 95% CI, −0.08 to −0.01). Among other tumour sub-types, older patients received short-term IPC more frequently than young patients (65+/<65: β = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03). At 8 years, outside large centres, IPC was delivered less frequently to older patients adjusted to cancer characteristics and period (65+/<65: β = −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.01). Conclusion: We found a relatively low CIF of IPC and that age influenced IPC delivery. Young triple-negative and older non-triple-negative patients needed more short-term IPCs. Older patients diagnosed outside large centres received less long-term IPC. These findings highlight the need for a wider implementation of IPC facilities and for more age-specific interventions.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)240-249
Nombre de pages10
journalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume137
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 1 sept. 2020
Modification externeOui

Contient cette citation