TY - JOUR
T1 - Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
T2 - Update on the New World Health Organization Classification
AU - Klöppel, Gönter
AU - Klimstra, David S.
AU - Hruban, Ralph H.
AU - Adsay, Volkan
AU - Capella, Carlo
AU - Couvelard, Anne
AU - Komminoth, Paul
AU - Rosa, Stefano La
AU - Ohike, Nobuyuki
AU - Osamura, Robert Y.
AU - Perren, Aurel
AU - Scoazec, Jean Yves
AU - Rindi, Guido
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© AJSP: Reviews and Reports. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - The first classification of the pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) that characterized the individual tumor by criteria with prognostic significance appeared in 1995. These criteria included a distinction by site and size, by degree of histological differentiation (well vs poor), by function (with and without hormonal syndrome), by angioinvasion, and by metastatic spread. The subsequently developedWorld Health Organization classifications in 2000, 2004, and 2010 largely followed this concept, but added proliferative activity as the best criterion reflecting tumor growth. In 2010, the classification combined histological differentiation with stratification into 3 tiers of proliferative activity, mainly using Ki67 as the most reliable measure of proliferation. The predictive value of this classification and grading system that was soon accompanied by an adequate TNM staging system has proved to be so excellent that all major treatment options of PanNENs, aswell as extrapancreatic NENs, have been currently based on this classification. The newWorld Health Organization 2017 classification is a refinement of the previous version. Its main change is the introduction of a "pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grade 3" category to recognize grade-discordant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and distinguish them from pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas, which are defined by their poorly differentiated nature. There is increasing evidence that this phenotypical classification of PanNENs allows a targeted molecular analysis, which is going to broaden our understanding of the tumors' biology.
AB - The first classification of the pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) that characterized the individual tumor by criteria with prognostic significance appeared in 1995. These criteria included a distinction by site and size, by degree of histological differentiation (well vs poor), by function (with and without hormonal syndrome), by angioinvasion, and by metastatic spread. The subsequently developedWorld Health Organization classifications in 2000, 2004, and 2010 largely followed this concept, but added proliferative activity as the best criterion reflecting tumor growth. In 2010, the classification combined histological differentiation with stratification into 3 tiers of proliferative activity, mainly using Ki67 as the most reliable measure of proliferation. The predictive value of this classification and grading system that was soon accompanied by an adequate TNM staging system has proved to be so excellent that all major treatment options of PanNENs, aswell as extrapancreatic NENs, have been currently based on this classification. The newWorld Health Organization 2017 classification is a refinement of the previous version. Its main change is the introduction of a "pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor grade 3" category to recognize grade-discordant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and distinguish them from pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas, which are defined by their poorly differentiated nature. There is increasing evidence that this phenotypical classification of PanNENs allows a targeted molecular analysis, which is going to broaden our understanding of the tumors' biology.
KW - WHO 2017 classification
KW - definition
KW - grading
KW - pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037671440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PCR.0000000000000211
DO - 10.1097/PCR.0000000000000211
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85037671440
SN - 2381-5949
VL - 22
SP - 233
EP - 239
JO - AJSP: Reviews and Reports
JF - AJSP: Reviews and Reports
IS - 5
ER -