TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient care and access to clinical trials in gynaecological oncology
T2 - global implications of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic
AU - Collaborating Groups: European Network for Gynaecological Oncology Trials (ENGOT), European Society for Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG), Pan-Arabian Research Society for Gynecological Oncology (PARSGO), North-East Ge
AU - Nasser, Sara
AU - Fotopoulou, Christina
AU - Gültekin, Murat
AU - Dimitrova, Desislava
AU - Bilir, Esra
AU - Inci, Gülhan
AU - Morice, Philippe
AU - Mirza, Mansoor Raza
AU - Martin, Antonio Gonzalez
AU - Berek, Jonathan
AU - Sehouli, Jalid
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/7/1
Y1 - 2024/7/1
N2 - Purpose: Our prospective international survey evaluated the impact of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management gynaecological malignancies from the multidisciplinary physicians’ perspective with particular focus on clinical infrastructures and trial participation. Methods: Our survey consisted of 53 COVID-related questions. It was sent to healthcare professionals in gynaecological oncology centres across Europe and Pan-Arabian region via the study groups and gynaecological societies from April 2020 to October 2020. All healthcare professionals treating gynaecological cancers were able to participate in our survey. Results: A total of 255 answers were collected from 30 countries. The majority (73%) of participants were gynaecological oncologists from university hospitals (71%) with at least an Intensive Care Unit with cardiopulmonary support available at their institutions. Most institutions continued to perform elective surgeries only for oncological cases (98%). Patients had to wait on average 2 weeks longer for their surgery appointments compared to previous years (range 0–12 weeks). Most cases that were prioritised for surgical intervention across all gynaecological tumours were early-stage disease (74%), primary situation (61%) and good ECOG status (63%). The radicality of surgery did not change in the majority of cases (78%) across all tumour types. During the pandemic, only 38% of clinicians stated they would start a new clinical trial. Almost half of the participants stated the pandemic negatively impacted the financial structure and support for clinical trials. Approximately 20% of clinicians did not feel well-informed regarding clinical algorithm for COVID-19 patients throughout the pandemic. Thirty percent stated that they are currently having trouble in providing adequate medical care due to staff shortage. Conclusion: Despite well-established guidelines, pandemic clearly affected clinical research and patientcare. Our survey underlines the necessity for building robust emergency algorithms tailored to gynaecological oncology to minimise negative impact in crises and to preserve access to clinical trials.
AB - Purpose: Our prospective international survey evaluated the impact of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management gynaecological malignancies from the multidisciplinary physicians’ perspective with particular focus on clinical infrastructures and trial participation. Methods: Our survey consisted of 53 COVID-related questions. It was sent to healthcare professionals in gynaecological oncology centres across Europe and Pan-Arabian region via the study groups and gynaecological societies from April 2020 to October 2020. All healthcare professionals treating gynaecological cancers were able to participate in our survey. Results: A total of 255 answers were collected from 30 countries. The majority (73%) of participants were gynaecological oncologists from university hospitals (71%) with at least an Intensive Care Unit with cardiopulmonary support available at their institutions. Most institutions continued to perform elective surgeries only for oncological cases (98%). Patients had to wait on average 2 weeks longer for their surgery appointments compared to previous years (range 0–12 weeks). Most cases that were prioritised for surgical intervention across all gynaecological tumours were early-stage disease (74%), primary situation (61%) and good ECOG status (63%). The radicality of surgery did not change in the majority of cases (78%) across all tumour types. During the pandemic, only 38% of clinicians stated they would start a new clinical trial. Almost half of the participants stated the pandemic negatively impacted the financial structure and support for clinical trials. Approximately 20% of clinicians did not feel well-informed regarding clinical algorithm for COVID-19 patients throughout the pandemic. Thirty percent stated that they are currently having trouble in providing adequate medical care due to staff shortage. Conclusion: Despite well-established guidelines, pandemic clearly affected clinical research and patientcare. Our survey underlines the necessity for building robust emergency algorithms tailored to gynaecological oncology to minimise negative impact in crises and to preserve access to clinical trials.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Clinical trials
KW - Gynaecologic oncology
KW - Healthcare disparities
KW - Pandemic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195394125&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00404-024-07511-4
DO - 10.1007/s00404-024-07511-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 38836928
AN - SCOPUS:85195394125
SN - 0932-0067
VL - 310
SP - 577
EP - 586
JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 1
ER -