TY - JOUR
T1 - Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation of painful metastases involving bone
T2 - A multicenter study
AU - Goetz, Matthew P.
AU - Callstrom, Matthew R.
AU - Charboneau, J. William
AU - Farrell, Michael A.
AU - Mans, Timothy P.
AU - Welch, Timothy J.
AU - Wong, Gilbert Y.
AU - Sloan, Jeff A.
AU - Novotny, Paul J.
AU - Petersen, Ivy A.
AU - Beres, Robert A.
AU - Regge, Daniele
AU - Capanna, Rodolfo
AU - Saker, Mark B.
AU - Grönemeyer, Dietrich H.W.
AU - Gevargez, Athour
AU - Ahrar, Kamran
AU - Choti, Michael A.
AU - Debaere, Thierry J.
AU - Rubin, Joseph
PY - 2004/12/1
Y1 - 2004/12/1
N2 - Purpose: Few options are available for pain relief in patients with bone metastases who fail standard treatments. We sought to determine the benefit of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in providing pain relief for patients with refractory pain secondary to metastases involving bone. Patients and Methods: Thirty-one US and 12 European patients with painful osteolytic metastases involving bone were treated with image-guided RFA using a multitip needle. Treated patients had ≥ 4/10 pain and had either failed or were poor candidates for standard treatments such as radiation or opioid analgesics. Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, worst pain intensity was the primary end point, with a 2-unit drop considered clinically significant. Results: Forty-three patients were treated (median follow-up, 16 weeks). Before RFA, the mean score for worst pain was 7.9 (range, 4/10 to 10/10). Four, 12, and 24 weeks following treatment, worst pain decreased to 4.5 (P < .0001), 3.0 (P < .0001), and 1.4 (P = .0005), respectively. Ninety-five percent (41 of 43 patients) experienced a decrease in pain that was considered clinically significant. Opioid usage significantly decreased at weeks 8 and 12. Adverse events were seen in 3 patients and included (1) a second-degree skin burn at the grounding pad site, (2) transient bowel and bladder incontinence following treatment of a metastasis involving the sacrum, and (3) a fracture of the acetabulum following RFA of an acetabular lesion. Conclusion: RFA of painful osteolytic metastases provides significant pain relief for cancer patients who have failed standard treatments.
AB - Purpose: Few options are available for pain relief in patients with bone metastases who fail standard treatments. We sought to determine the benefit of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in providing pain relief for patients with refractory pain secondary to metastases involving bone. Patients and Methods: Thirty-one US and 12 European patients with painful osteolytic metastases involving bone were treated with image-guided RFA using a multitip needle. Treated patients had ≥ 4/10 pain and had either failed or were poor candidates for standard treatments such as radiation or opioid analgesics. Using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, worst pain intensity was the primary end point, with a 2-unit drop considered clinically significant. Results: Forty-three patients were treated (median follow-up, 16 weeks). Before RFA, the mean score for worst pain was 7.9 (range, 4/10 to 10/10). Four, 12, and 24 weeks following treatment, worst pain decreased to 4.5 (P < .0001), 3.0 (P < .0001), and 1.4 (P = .0005), respectively. Ninety-five percent (41 of 43 patients) experienced a decrease in pain that was considered clinically significant. Opioid usage significantly decreased at weeks 8 and 12. Adverse events were seen in 3 patients and included (1) a second-degree skin burn at the grounding pad site, (2) transient bowel and bladder incontinence following treatment of a metastasis involving the sacrum, and (3) a fracture of the acetabulum following RFA of an acetabular lesion. Conclusion: RFA of painful osteolytic metastases provides significant pain relief for cancer patients who have failed standard treatments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1342268521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.097
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.097
M3 - Article
C2 - 14722039
AN - SCOPUS:1342268521
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 22
SP - 300
EP - 306
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 2
ER -