TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase i study of onapristone, a type i antiprogestin, in female patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic progesterone receptor-expressing cancers
AU - Cottu, Paul H.
AU - Bonneterre, Jacques
AU - Varga, Andrea
AU - Campone, Mario
AU - Leary, Alexandra
AU - Floquet, Anne
AU - Berton-Rigaud, Dominique
AU - Sablin, Marie Paule
AU - Lesoin, Anne
AU - Rezai, Keyvan
AU - Lokiec, François M.
AU - Lhomme, Catherine
AU - Bosq, Jacques
AU - Bexon, Alice S.
AU - Gilles, Erard M.
AU - Proniuk, Stefan
AU - Dieras, Veronique
AU - Jackson, David M.
AU - Zukiwski, Alexander
AU - Italiano, Antoine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Cottu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Introduction Onapristone is a type I progesterone receptor (PR) antagonist, which prevents PR- mediated DNA transcription. Onapristone is active in multiple preclinical models and two prior studies demonstrated promising activity in patients with breast cancer. We conducted a study of extended release (ER) Onapristone to determine a recommended dose and explore the role of transcriptionally-activated PR (APR), detected as an aggregated subnuclear distribution pattern, as a predictive biomarker. Methods An open-label, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, phase 1 study (target n = 60; NCT02052128) included female patients 18 years with PRpos tumors. APR analysis was performed on archival tumor tissue. Patients were randomized to five cohorts of extended release (ER) onapristone tablets 10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 mg BID, or immediate release 100 mg QD until progressive disease or intolerability. Primary endpoint was to identify the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary endpoints included safety, clinical benefit and pharmacokinetics. Results The phase 1 dose escalation component of the study is complete (n = 52). Tumor diagnosis included: endometrial carcinoma 12; breast cancer 20; ovarian cancer 13; other 7. Median age was 64 (36-84). No dose limiting toxicity was observed with reported liver function test elevation related only to liver metastases. The RP2D was 50 mg ER BID. Median therapy duration was 8 weeks (range 2-44), and 9 patients had clinical benefit >24 weeks, including 2 patients with APRpos endometrial carcinoma. Conclusion Clinical benefit with excellent tolerance was seen in heavily pretreated patients with endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer. The data support the development of Onapristone in endometrial endometrioid cancer. Onapristone should also be evaluated in ovarian and breast cancers along with APR immunohistochemistry validation.
AB - Introduction Onapristone is a type I progesterone receptor (PR) antagonist, which prevents PR- mediated DNA transcription. Onapristone is active in multiple preclinical models and two prior studies demonstrated promising activity in patients with breast cancer. We conducted a study of extended release (ER) Onapristone to determine a recommended dose and explore the role of transcriptionally-activated PR (APR), detected as an aggregated subnuclear distribution pattern, as a predictive biomarker. Methods An open-label, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, phase 1 study (target n = 60; NCT02052128) included female patients 18 years with PRpos tumors. APR analysis was performed on archival tumor tissue. Patients were randomized to five cohorts of extended release (ER) onapristone tablets 10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 mg BID, or immediate release 100 mg QD until progressive disease or intolerability. Primary endpoint was to identify the recommended phase 2 dose. Secondary endpoints included safety, clinical benefit and pharmacokinetics. Results The phase 1 dose escalation component of the study is complete (n = 52). Tumor diagnosis included: endometrial carcinoma 12; breast cancer 20; ovarian cancer 13; other 7. Median age was 64 (36-84). No dose limiting toxicity was observed with reported liver function test elevation related only to liver metastases. The RP2D was 50 mg ER BID. Median therapy duration was 8 weeks (range 2-44), and 9 patients had clinical benefit >24 weeks, including 2 patients with APRpos endometrial carcinoma. Conclusion Clinical benefit with excellent tolerance was seen in heavily pretreated patients with endometrial, ovarian and breast cancer. The data support the development of Onapristone in endometrial endometrioid cancer. Onapristone should also be evaluated in ovarian and breast cancers along with APR immunohistochemistry validation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054725051&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0204973
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0204973
M3 - Article
C2 - 30304013
AN - SCOPUS:85054725051
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 13
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 10
M1 - e0204973
ER -