TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase III multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tivantinib (ARQ 197) plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer
AU - Scagliotti, Giorgio
AU - Von Pawel, Joachim
AU - Novello, Silvia
AU - Ramlau, Rodryg
AU - Favaretto, Adolfo
AU - Barlesi, Fabrice
AU - Akerley, Wallace
AU - Orlov, Sergey
AU - Santoro, Armando
AU - Spigel, David
AU - Hirsh, Vera
AU - Shepherd, Frances A.
AU - Sequist, Lecia V.
AU - Sandler, Alan
AU - Ross, Jeffrey S.
AU - Wang, Qiang
AU - Von Roemeling, Reinhard
AU - Shuster, Dale
AU - Schwartz, Brian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2015/8/20
Y1 - 2015/8/20
N2 - Purpose: Tivantinib, a MET receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated increased anticancer activity in preclinical and early clinical studies when combined with erlotinib. Our study aimed to confirm efficacy and safety of the combination in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC previously treated with one to two systemic regimens, including a platinum doublet, were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib 150 mg daily plus oral tivantinib 360 mg twice daily (E + T) or erlotinib plus placebo (E + P) until disease progression. Tumor specimens were evaluated for EGFR and KRAS mutations, MET expression, and MET gene amplification. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary and exploratory objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), OS in molecular subgroups, and safety. Results: The study enrolled 1,048 patients and was discontinued for futility at the interim analysis. OS did not improve with E + T versus E + P (median OS, 8.5 v 7.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15; P = .81), even though PFS increased (median PFS, 3.6 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P < .001). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested OS improvement in patients with high MET expression (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.01). Most common adverse events occurring with E + T versus E + P were rash (33.1% v 37.3%, respectively), diarrhea (34.6% v 41.0%), asthenia or fatigue (43.5% v 38.1%), and neutropenia (grade 3 to 4; 8.5% v 0.8%). Conclusion: E + T was well tolerated and increased PFS but did not improve OS in the overall nonsquamous NSCLC population.
AB - Purpose: Tivantinib, a MET receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated increased anticancer activity in preclinical and early clinical studies when combined with erlotinib. Our study aimed to confirm efficacy and safety of the combination in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC previously treated with one to two systemic regimens, including a platinum doublet, were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib 150 mg daily plus oral tivantinib 360 mg twice daily (E + T) or erlotinib plus placebo (E + P) until disease progression. Tumor specimens were evaluated for EGFR and KRAS mutations, MET expression, and MET gene amplification. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary and exploratory objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), OS in molecular subgroups, and safety. Results: The study enrolled 1,048 patients and was discontinued for futility at the interim analysis. OS did not improve with E + T versus E + P (median OS, 8.5 v 7.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15; P = .81), even though PFS increased (median PFS, 3.6 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P < .001). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested OS improvement in patients with high MET expression (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.01). Most common adverse events occurring with E + T versus E + P were rash (33.1% v 37.3%, respectively), diarrhea (34.6% v 41.0%), asthenia or fatigue (43.5% v 38.1%), and neutropenia (grade 3 to 4; 8.5% v 0.8%). Conclusion: E + T was well tolerated and increased PFS but did not improve OS in the overall nonsquamous NSCLC population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940394869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.7317
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.7317
M3 - Article
C2 - 26169611
AN - SCOPUS:84940394869
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 33
SP - 2667
EP - 2674
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 24
ER -