Phase III multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tivantinib (ARQ 197) plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Giorgio Scagliotti, Joachim Von Pawel, Silvia Novello, Rodryg Ramlau, Adolfo Favaretto, Fabrice Barlesi, Wallace Akerley, Sergey Orlov, Armando Santoro, David Spigel, Vera Hirsh, Frances A. Shepherd, Lecia V. Sequist, Alan Sandler, Jeffrey S. Ross, Qiang Wang, Reinhard Von Roemeling, Dale Shuster, Brian Schwartz

Résultats de recherche: Contribution à un journalArticleRevue par des pairs

231 Citations (Scopus)

Résumé

Purpose: Tivantinib, a MET receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated increased anticancer activity in preclinical and early clinical studies when combined with erlotinib. Our study aimed to confirm efficacy and safety of the combination in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC previously treated with one to two systemic regimens, including a platinum doublet, were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib 150 mg daily plus oral tivantinib 360 mg twice daily (E + T) or erlotinib plus placebo (E + P) until disease progression. Tumor specimens were evaluated for EGFR and KRAS mutations, MET expression, and MET gene amplification. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary and exploratory objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), OS in molecular subgroups, and safety. Results: The study enrolled 1,048 patients and was discontinued for futility at the interim analysis. OS did not improve with E + T versus E + P (median OS, 8.5 v 7.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15; P = .81), even though PFS increased (median PFS, 3.6 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P < .001). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested OS improvement in patients with high MET expression (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.01). Most common adverse events occurring with E + T versus E + P were rash (33.1% v 37.3%, respectively), diarrhea (34.6% v 41.0%), asthenia or fatigue (43.5% v 38.1%), and neutropenia (grade 3 to 4; 8.5% v 0.8%). Conclusion: E + T was well tolerated and increased PFS but did not improve OS in the overall nonsquamous NSCLC population.

langue originaleAnglais
Pages (de - à)2667-2674
Nombre de pages8
journalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume33
Numéro de publication24
Les DOIs
étatPublié - 20 août 2015
Modification externeOui

Contient cette citation