TY - JOUR
T1 - Point of Care Measurement of Body Mass Index and Thyroid Nodule Malignancy Risk Assessment
AU - Ahmadi, Sara
AU - Pappa, Theodora
AU - Kang, Alex S.
AU - Coleman, Alexandra K.
AU - Landa, Iñigo
AU - Marqusee, Ellen
AU - Kim, Matthew
AU - Angell, Trevor E.
AU - Alexander, Erik K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Ahmadi, Pappa, Kang, Coleman, Landa, Marqusee, Kim, Angell and Alexander.
PY - 2022/2/11
Y1 - 2022/2/11
N2 - Background: Large scale epidemiology studies have suggested obesity may increase the risk of thyroid cancer, though no prospective analyses using real-world measurement of BMI at a time proximate to initial thyroid nodule evaluation have been performed. Methods: We performed a prospective, cohort analysis over 3 years of consecutive patients presenting for thyroid nodule evaluation. We measured BMI proximate to the time of initial evaluation and correlated this with the final diagnosis of benign or malignant disease. We further correlated patient BMI with aggressivity of thyroid cancer, if detected. Results: Among 1,259 consecutive patients with clinically relevant nodules, 199(15%) were malignant. BMI averaged 28.6 kg/m2 (SD: 6.35, range:16.46-59.26). There was no correlation between the measurement of BMI and risk of thyroid cancer (p=0.58) as mean BMI was 28.9 kg/m2 and 28.6 kg/m2 in cancerous and benign cohorts, respectively. Similarly, BMI did not predict aggressive thyroid cancer (p=0.15). While overall nodule size was associated with increased BMI (p<0.01), these data require further validation as obesity may hinder nodule detection until large. Conclusion: In contrast to findings published from large scale association studies drawn from national databases, these prospective data of consecutive patients presenting for nodule evaluation detect no association of obesity (as measured by BMI) with thyroid cancer. Real time measurement of BMI at the time of thyroid nodule evaluation does not contribute to cancer risk assessment.
AB - Background: Large scale epidemiology studies have suggested obesity may increase the risk of thyroid cancer, though no prospective analyses using real-world measurement of BMI at a time proximate to initial thyroid nodule evaluation have been performed. Methods: We performed a prospective, cohort analysis over 3 years of consecutive patients presenting for thyroid nodule evaluation. We measured BMI proximate to the time of initial evaluation and correlated this with the final diagnosis of benign or malignant disease. We further correlated patient BMI with aggressivity of thyroid cancer, if detected. Results: Among 1,259 consecutive patients with clinically relevant nodules, 199(15%) were malignant. BMI averaged 28.6 kg/m2 (SD: 6.35, range:16.46-59.26). There was no correlation between the measurement of BMI and risk of thyroid cancer (p=0.58) as mean BMI was 28.9 kg/m2 and 28.6 kg/m2 in cancerous and benign cohorts, respectively. Similarly, BMI did not predict aggressive thyroid cancer (p=0.15). While overall nodule size was associated with increased BMI (p<0.01), these data require further validation as obesity may hinder nodule detection until large. Conclusion: In contrast to findings published from large scale association studies drawn from national databases, these prospective data of consecutive patients presenting for nodule evaluation detect no association of obesity (as measured by BMI) with thyroid cancer. Real time measurement of BMI at the time of thyroid nodule evaluation does not contribute to cancer risk assessment.
KW - BMI
KW - nodule size
KW - obesity
KW - thyroid cancer
KW - thyroid nodule
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125248044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fendo.2022.824226
DO - 10.3389/fendo.2022.824226
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85125248044
SN - 1664-2392
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Endocrinology
JF - Frontiers in Endocrinology
M1 - 824226
ER -